Divergence revealed by population crosses in\ud the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum

Article English OPEN
Attia, F.A. ; Tregenza, T. (2004)

There is growing interest in the potential for population divergence (and hence speciation) to be\ud driven by co-evolutionary arms races due to conflicts of interest between the sexes over matings\ud and investment in offspring. It has been suggested that the signature of sexually antagonistic\ud co-evolution may be revealed in crosses between populations through females showing\ud the weakest response to males from their own population compared with males from other\ud populations. The rationale behind this prediction is that females will not have been able to\ud evolve counter-adaptations to manipulative signals from males with which they have not\ud co-evolved. Recent theoretical treatments suggest that this prediction is not strictly exclusive\ud to the sexual conflict theory, but it remains the case that population crosses can provide\ud insights into the evolution of mate choice within populations. We describe crosses between six\ud populations of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Although successful matings are no\ud more or less likely between populations compared to within populations, females do increase\ud their oviposition rate in response to males from other populations, relative to males from their\ud own population. Our results are therefore consistent with the proposition that sexual conflict\ud has driven population divergence in this species. However, we argue that the available evidence\ud is more supportive of the hypothesis that increased female investment in response to males from\ud other populations is a side-effect of inbreeding avoidance within populations.
  • References (21)
    21 references, page 1 of 3

    Andres, J.A. and Arnqvist, G. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268: 399-405.

    Bateson, P. 1983. Optimal outbreeding. In Mate Choice (P. Bateson, ed.), pp. 257-277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Bloch-Qazi, M.C., Herbeck, J.T. and Lewis, S.M. 1996. Mechanisms of sperm transfer and storage in the red flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 89: 892-897.

    Bloch-Qazi, M.C., Aprille, J.R. and Lewis, S.M. 1998. Female role in sperm storage in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Molec. Integr. Physiol., 120: 641-647.

    Burley, N. 1986. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am. Nat., 127: 415-445.

    Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. and Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18: 41-47.

    Clark, A.G., Begun, D.J. and Prout, T. 1999. Female × male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science, 283: 217-220.

    Hosken, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U. and Garner, T.W.J. 2002. Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 1701-1707.

    Howard, D.J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 30: 109-132.

    Lewis, S.M. and Austad, S.N. 1994. Sexual selection in flour beetles - the relationship between sperm precedence and male olfactory attractiveness. Behav. Ecol., 5: 219-224.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 53
Share - Bookmark