Beyond chance? The persistence of performance in online poker

Article English OPEN
Potter van Loon, Rogjer J.D. ; van den Assem, Martijn J. ; van Dolder, Dennie (2015)

textabstractA major issue in the widespread controversy about the legality of poker and the appropriate taxation of winnings is whether poker should be considered a game of skill or a game of chance. To inform this debate we present an analysis into the role of skill in the performance of online poker players, using a large database with hundreds of millions of player-hand observations from real money ring games at three different stakes levels. We find that players whose earlier profitability was in the top (bottom) deciles perform better (worse) and are substantially more likely to end up in the top (bottom) performance deciles of the following time period. Regression analyses of performance on historical performance and other skill-related proxies provide further evidence for persistence and predictability. Simulations point out that skill dominates chance when performance is measured over 1,500 or more hands of play.
  • References (19)
    19 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Kelly JM, Dhar Z, Verbiest T (2007) Poker and the law: Is it a game of skill or chance and legally does it matter? Gaming Law Review 11: 190-202.

    2. Cabot A, Hannum RC (2005) Poker: Public policy, law, mathematics, and the future of an American tradition. Cooley Law Rev 22: 443-514.

    3. Grohman C (2006) Reconsidering regulation: A historical view of the legality of internet poker and discussion of the internet gambling ban of 2006. Journal of Legal Technology Risk Management 1: 34- 74.

    4. Tselnik MA (2007) Check, raise, or fold: Poker and the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. Hofstra Law Rev 35: 1617-1670.

    5. Kadane JB (1986) Does electronic draw poker require skill to play? In: DeGroot MH, Fienberg SE, Kadane JB, editors. Statistics and the Law. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 333-343.

    6. Borm PEM, van der Genugten BB (2001) On a relative measure of skill for games with chance elements. Top 9: 91-114.

    7. Dreef M, Borm PEM, van der Genugten BB (2003) On strategy and relative skill in poker. International Game Theory Review 5: 83-103.

    8. Dreef M, Borm PEM, van der Genugten BB (2004) Measuring skill in games: Several approaches discussed. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 59: 375-391.

    9. Dreef M, Borm PEM, van der Genugten BB (2004) A new relative skill measure for games with chance elements. Manage Decis Econ 25: 255-264.

    10. Hendrickx RLP, Borm PEM, van der Genugten BB, Hilbers P (2008) Measuring skill in more-person games with applications to poker. CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2008-106.

  • Related Research Results (5)
  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark