Third Generation CPTED? Rethinking the Basis for Crime Prevention Strategies

Doctoral thesis English OPEN
Gibson, Victoria
  • Subject: L700 | M900 | K900

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is a concept which has developed over the past five decades through a range of fields. It is based on the premise that modifications to the built and natural environment can reduce both crime and fear, and improve the overall quality of life. CPTED relies on the cooperation of a variety of agencies; however, research has revealed important inherent difficulties regarding multi-agency working and that current practice is neither sustainable nor does it consider social characteristics which may impact upon crime and the effectiveness of CPTED initiatives. Criticisms of diverse factors relating to CPTED have been expressed but how robust such criticisms are and if suitable resolutions exist has not been explored. Using a mixed methods approach, this PhD seeks to improve and update the CPTED concept by addressing issues of communication and collaboration between CPTED stakeholders, and suggests robust ways of enhancing the social context within CPTED planning. The research answers the following fundamental questions: what are the underlying problems of the CPTED concept and how did they come to fruition; and can the approach to CPTED planning be re-examined and updated to reduce the inherent underlying difficulties and improve the transferability and practical application of CPTED initiatives. The research highlights language and definition inconsistencies in the CPTED framework, transferability and engagement issues between CPTED stakeholders and an unestablished but vital link between CPTED and social sustainability and context. The thesis delivers three major academic contributions to new knowledge. It firmly identifies failings in the CPTED concept since its inception to present; it proposes an updated framework which is theoretically driven, and represents a holistic catchment of all CPTED knowledge; and it makes a solid link between crime prevention and the sustainable development of communities highlighting its importance for context analysis.
  • References (13)
    13 references, page 1 of 2

    • MacLeavy, J. (2008) Managing Diversity? 'Community Cohesion' and Its Limits in Neoliberal Urban Policy. Geography Compass, 2(2), 538-558 Macnamara, J. (1982). Names for things: A study of human learning. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.

    • Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Great British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 1-20.

    • Madriz, E. (1996). The perception of risk in the workplace: A test of routine activity theory.

    Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 407-412.

    • Marcum, C.D., Ricketts, M.L., & Higgins, G.E. (2010). Assessing sex experiences of online victimization: An examination of adolescent online behaviors utilizing Routine Activity Theory.

    Criminal Justice Review, 35(4): 412- 437.

    • Maliene, V. and Malys, N. (2009) High Quality Housing: A Key Issue in delivering sustainable communities. Building and Environment. Vol. 44 (2) pg. 426 - 430. Elsevier.

    • Manski, C. F. (2014). Communicating uncertainty in official economic statistics: An Appraisal Fifty Years after Morgenstern. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(3), 631-653.

    • Manzo, L. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of environmental relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 47-61.

    Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Northumbria Research Link - IRUS-UK 0 431
Share - Bookmark