Constraint-induced Aphasia Therapy versus Intensive Semantic Treatment in Fluent Aphasia

Article English OPEN
Willsens, I. ; Vandenborre, D. ; van Dun, K. ; Verhoeven, J. ; Visch-Brink, E. (2015)
  • Publisher: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0018
  • Subject: P1 | R
    mesheuropmc: behavioral disciplines and activities

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two intensive therapy methods: Constraint- 4 Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT) and semantic therapy (BOX). \ud \ud Method: Nine patients with chronic fluent aphasia participated in a therapy programme 6 to establish behavioral treatment outcomes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (CIAT or BOX). \ud \ud Results: Intensive therapy significantly improved verbal communication. However, BOX 9 treatment showed a more pronounced improvement on two communication measures, namely on a standardized assessment for verbal communication, the Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (Blomert, Koster, & Kean, 1995) and on a subjective rating scale, the Communicative Effectiveness Index (Lomas et al., 1989). All 13 participants significantly improved on one (or more) subtests of the Aachen Aphasia Test (Graetz et al., 1992), an impairment-focused assessment. There was a treatment-specific effect. Therapy with BOX had a significant effect on language comprehension and on semantics, while of CIAT affected language production and phonology. \ud \ud Conclusion: The findings indicate that in patients with fluent aphasia (1) intensive treatment has a significant effect on language and verbal communication, (2) intensive therapy results in selective treatment effects and (3) an intensive semantic treatment shows a more striking mean improvement on verbal communication in comparison to communication-based CIAT-treatment.
  • References (8)

    - Bastiaanse, R., Bosje, M., & Visch-Brink, E. (1995). Psycholinguistic Assessments of - Edwards, S., & Tucker, K. (2006). Verb retrieval in fluent aphasia: a clinical study.

    - Ellis, A.W., & Young, A.W. (1996). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: - Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Virion, C.R. (2009). Constraint-induced language therapy for agrammatism: Role of grammaticality constraints. Aphasiology, 23 (7-8), 977-988.

    Holland, A.L., Greenhouse, J.B., Fromm, D., & Swindell, C.S. (1989). Predictors of Maher, L., Kendall, D., Swearengin, J., Rodriguez, A., Leon, S., Pingel, K., … Rothi, Mariën, P., Mampaey, E., Vervaet, A., Saerens, J., & De Deyn, P.P. (1998).

    Moses, M.E., Nickels, L.A., & Sheard, C. (2004). I'm sitting here feeling aphasic. A Robson, H., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M.A. (2012). Revealing and quantifying the aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 276-288.

    Ruiter, M.B., Kolk, H.H.J., Rietveld, T.C.M., Dijkstra, N., & Lotgering, E. (2011).

    Verhoeven, J. (2005). Illustrations of the IPA: Belgian Standard Dutch. Journal of the Visch-Brink, E.G., Bajema, I.M., & Sandt-Koenderman, M.E., van de. (1997).

    Lexical semantic therapy: BOX. Aphasiology, 11(11), 1057-1078.

    Visch-Brink, E.G., & Bajema, I.M. (2001). BOX: Een semantisch therapieprogramma.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 456
Share - Bookmark