Implementing evidence-based recommended practices for the management of patients with mild traumatic brain injuries in Australian emergency care departments: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Article English OPEN
Bosch, Marije ; McKenzie, Joanne E ; Mortimer, Duncan ; Tavender, Emma J ; Francis, Jill J ; Brennan, Sue E ; Knott, Jonathan C ; Ponsford, Jennie L ; Pearce, Andrew ; O’Connor, Denise A ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M ; Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V ; Gruen, Russell L ; Green, Sally E ; , (2014)
  • Publisher: Springer Nature
  • Journal: Trials (vol: 15, pp: 281-281)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4107995, doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-281
  • Subject: RC | Medicine (miscellaneous) | Cluster trial | Australia, Brain Injuries, Clinical Protocols, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Education, Medical, Continuing, Emergency Medical Services, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence, Hospital Costs, Humans, Injury Severity Score, Inservice Training, Patient Care Team, Physician's Practice Patterns, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Research Design, Sample Size, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome | Study Protocol | Emergency department | Mild traumatic brain injury | Pharmacology (medical)

Background: Mild head injuries commonly present to emergency departments. The challenges facing clinicians in emergency departments include identifying which patients have traumatic brain injury, and which patients can safely be sent home. Traumatic brain injuries may exist with subtle symptoms or signs, but can still lead to adverse outcomes. Despite the existence of several high quality clinical practice guidelines, internationally and in Australia, research shows inconsistent implementation of these recommendations. The aim of this trial is to test the effectiveness of a targeted, theory- and evidence-informed implementation intervention to increase the uptake of three key clinical recommendations regarding the emergency department management of adult patients (18 years of age or older) who present following mild head injuries (concussion), compared with passive dissemination of these recommendations. The primary objective is to establish whether the intervention is effective in increasing the percentage of patients for which appropriate post-traumatic amnesia screening is performed. / Methods/design: The design of this study is a cluster randomised trial. We aim to include 34 Australian 24-hour emergency departments, which will be randomised to an intervention or control group. Control group departments will receive a copy of the most recent Australian evidence-based clinical practice guideline on the acute management of patients with mild head injuries. The intervention group will receive an implementation intervention based on an analysis of influencing factors, which include local stakeholder meetings, identification of nursing and medical opinion leaders in each site, a train-the-trainer day and standardised education and interactive workshops delivered by the opinion leaders during a 3 month period of time. Clinical practice outcomes will be collected retrospectively from medical records by independent chart auditors over the 2 month period following intervention delivery (patient level outcomes). In consenting hospitals, eligible patients will be recruited for a follow-up telephone interview conducted by trained researchers. A cost-effectiveness analysis and process evaluation using mixed-methods will be conducted. Sample size calculations are based on including 30 patients on average per department. Outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation. / Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612001286831 (date registered 12 December 2012).
  • References (116)
    116 references, page 1 of 12

    1. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R: Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:728-741.

    2. Abelson-Mitchell N: Epidemiology and prevention of head injuries: literature review. J Clin Nurs 2008, 17:46-57.

    3. Teasdale G, Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974, 2:81-84.

    4. Jagoda AS, Bazarian JJ, Bruns JJ Jr, Cantrill SV, Gean AD, Howard PK, Ghajar J, Riggio S, Wright DW, Wears RL, Bakshy A, Burgess P, Wald M, Whitson W: Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decision making in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med 2008, 52:714-748.

    5. Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, Dekker HM, Vos PE, Kool DR, Nederkoorn PJ, Hofman PA, Twijnstra A, Tanghe HL, Hunink MG: External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005, 294:1519-1525.

    6. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, Brison R, Cass D, Eisenhauer MA, McKnight RD, Bandiera G, Holroyd B, Lee JS, Dreyer J, Worthington JR, Reardon M, Greenberg G, Lesiuk H, MacPhail I, Wells GA: Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005, 294:1511-1518.

    7. Alves W, Macciocchi S, Barth J: Postconcussive symptoms after uncomplicated mild head injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993, 8:48-59.

    8. Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A: Long-term outcomes after uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison with trauma controls. J Neurotrauma 2011, 28:937-946.

    9. Willer B, Leddy JJ: Management of concussion and post-concussion syndrome. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2006, 8:415-426.

    10. Von Wild KR: Posttraumatic rehabilitation and one year outcome following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI): data from the well defined population based German prospectice study 2000-2002. Acta Neurochir 2008, 101:55-60.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark