Public perceptions of internet, familial and localised sexual grooming: predicting perceived prevalence and safety

Article English OPEN
Williams, Matthew Leighton ; Hudson, Kirsty Joanne (2013)
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1080/13552600.2012.705341
  • Subject: HN | HT | HV
    mesheuropmc: behavior and behavior mechanisms | human activities | fungi | psychological phenomena and processes

This paper examines public perceptions of three sexual grooming types: computer-mediated sexual grooming (CMSG), familial sexual grooming (FSG) and localised sexual grooming (LSG). Using data from a national survey of 557 respondents from the United Kingdom, we tested models that predicted perceptions of the prevalence of CMSG, FSG and LSG and the perceived safety of internet, familial and localised grooming spaces. Media-related factors were the most significant in predicting higher levels of perceived prevalence of CMSG and disagreement in relation to safety of internet and public spaces. Knowledge of a grooming victim was most significant in predicting higher levels of perceived prevalence of FSG and LSG and higher levels disagreement in relation to the safety of the home. The findings suggest that the public express too little concern over familial sexual grooming and that initiatives should be introduced to make citizens more aware of the distinctions between types of sexual grooming behaviours, settings and offenders.
  • References (58)
    58 references, page 1 of 6

    Brayford, J. & Deering, J. (2012). Media influences on public perceptions of sex offenders. In J. Bradford, F. Cowe & J. Deering (Eds). Sex offenders: Punish, help, change or control? Theory, policy and practice explored (pp. 52-68). London: Routledge.

    Brown, S., Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2008). What people think about the management of sex offenders in the Community. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 259-274.

    Carr, J. (2004). Child abuse, child pornography and the internet. London: NCH, The Children's Charity.

    Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) (2011). Out of mind, out of sight: Breaking down the barrier to understanding child sexual exploitation. London: Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre.

    Craven, S., Brown, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2006). Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 3, 287-299.

    Craven, S., Brown, S. J., & Gilchrist, E. (2007). Current responses to sexual grooming: Implications for prevention. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 60-71.

    Davidson, J. (2008). Child sexual abuse: Media Representations and government reactions. London: Routledge-Cavendish.

    Davidson, J., & Gottschalk, P. (2011). Internet child abuse: Current research and policy. London: Routledge-Cavendish.

    Davidson, J., & Martellozzo, E. (2008). Protecting children online: Towards a safer internet. In G. Letherby, K. Williams, P. Birch & M. Cain (Eds). Sex as crime? (pp. 338-355). Cullompton: Willan.

    Dorofeev, S., & Grant, P. (2006). Statistics for real-life sample surveys: Non-simple random samples and weighted data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Similar Research Results (4)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 348
Share - Bookmark