The nature of information science: changing models

Article English OPEN
Robinson, L. ; Karamuftuoglu, M. (2010)
  • Subject: Z665

Introduction. This paper considers the nature of information science as a discipline and profession.\ud \ud Method. It is based on conceptual analysis of the information science literature, and consideration of philosophical perspectives, particularly those of Kuhn and Peirce.\ud \ud Results. It is argued that information science may be understood as a field of study, with human recorded information as its concern, focusing on the components of the information chain, studied through the perspective of domain analysis, in specific or general contexts. A particular aspect of interest is those aspects of information organization, and of human information-related behaviour, which are invariant to changes in technology. Information science can also be seen as a science of evaluation of information, understood as semantic content with respect to qualitative growth of knowledge and change in knowledge structures in domains.\ud \ud Conclusions. This study contributes to the understanding of the unique 'academic territory' of information science, a discipline with an identity distinct from adjoining subjects.
  • References (11)
    11 references, page 1 of 2

    Barwise, J., & Perry, J., (1983), Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.

    Barwise, J. and Seligman, J., (1997), Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Bates, M.J., (2006), Fundamental forms of information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 57(8), 1033-1045 Heilprin, L.B., (1989), Foundations of information science re-examined, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 23, 343-372 Hjørland, B., (2007), Information: Objective or subjective/situational?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 1448-1456 Hjørland B., (2002A), Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative, Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422-462 Hjørland B. and Albrechtsen H. (1995), Towards a new horizon in information science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425 Hjørland, B. and Hartel, J., (2003), Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains, Knowledge Organisation, 25(4), 162-201 Karamuftuoglu M., (2009), Situating Logic and Information in information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60 (10), 2019-2031.

    Karamuftuoglu M., (2007), Need for a Systemic Theory of Classification in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58 (13), 1977 - 1987.

    Karamuftuoglu, M., (2006), Information arts and information science: time to unite? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1780-1793 Kari, J. (2010), Diversity in the conceptions of information use, Information Research, in press Kuhn, T.S., (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Meadows, A.J., (1991), Introduction to Knowledge and communication: essays on the information chain, London: Bingley, pages vii-ix Peirce, C.S. (1958), Collected Papers, Vols. 1-8. (Eds) C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A.W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Robinson, L. (2009), Information science: communication chain and domain analysis, Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 578-591 Shapiro, F.R., (1995), Coinage of the term 'Information Science' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(5), 384-385 Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W., (1949), The mathematical theory of communications. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

    Summers, R., Oppenheim, C., Meadows, J., McKnight, C., and Kinnell, M., (1999), Information science in 2010: a Loughborough University view, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1153-1162 Sundin, O., (2003), Towards an understanding of symbolic aspects of professional information: an analysis of the nursing domain', Knowledge Organisation, 30(3/4), 170-181 Tennis, J.T., (2003), Two axes of domains for domain analysis, Knowledge Organisation, 30(3/4), 191-195

    Turner, D. and Allen, W. (2010), Investigating oral information, Information Research, in press van Rijsbergen, C.J. and Lalmas M., (1996), Information Calculus for Information Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (5), 385-398.

    Vickery, B.C. (2009), Meeting the challenge (guest editorial) in Information science in transition, A. Gilchrist (ed.), London: Facet Publishing, xxi-xxix Webber, S., (2003), Information science in 2003: a critique, Journal of Information Science, 29(4), 311-330

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 81
Share - Bookmark