Ras/Raf-1/MAPK pathway mediates response to tamoxifen but not chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Article English OPEN
McGlynn, L.M. ; Kirkegaard, T. ; Edwards, J. ; Tovey, S. ; Cameron, D. ; Twelves, C. ; Bartlett, J.M.S. ; Cooke, T.G. (2009)

<b>Purpose</b>: The expression and activation of the Ras/Raf-1/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway plays an important role in the development and progression of cancer, and may influence response to treatments such as tamoxifen and chemotherapy. In this study we investigated whether the expression and activation of the key components of this pathway influenced clinical outcome, to test the hypothesis that activation of the MAPK pathway drives resistance to tamoxifen and chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.\ud \ud <b>Experimental Design</b>: Breast tumors from patients at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary and others treated within the BR9601 trial were analyzed for expression of the three Ras isoforms, total Raf-1, active and inactive forms of Raf-1 [pRaf(ser338) and pRaf(ser259), respectively], MAPK, and phospho-MAPK using an immunohistochemical approach. Analyses were done with respect to disease free-survival and overall survival.\ud \ud <b>Results</b>: Expression and activation of the Ras pathway was associated with loss of benefit from treatment with tamoxifen but not chemotherapy. Overexpression of pRaf(ser338) was associated with shortened disease-free and overall survival time in univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis suggested pRaf(ser338) was independent of known prognostic markers in predicting outcome following tamoxifen treatment (<i>P</i>=0.03).\ud \ud <b>Conclusion</b>: This study suggests that activation of the Ras pathway predicts for poor outcome on tamoxifen but not chemotherapy, and identifies pRaf(ser338) as a potential marker of resistance to estrogen receptor–targeted therapy. In addition, it suggests that expression of pRaf(ser338) could identify patients for whom tamoxifen alone is insufficient adjuvant systemic therapy, but for whom the addition of chemotherapy may be of benefit.
  • References (48)
    48 references, page 1 of 5

    1. Kolch W. Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions. Biochem J 2000;351 Pt 2:289-305.

    2. Reese DM and Slamon D. J. HER-2/neu signal transduction in human breast and ovarian cancer. Stem Cells 1997;15:1-8.

    3. Yarden Y and Sliwkowski M. X. Untangling the ErbB Signalling Network. Nature Reviews:- Molecular Cell Biology 2001;2:127-37.

    4. Adjei AA. Blocking Oncogenic Ras Signaling for Cancer Therapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:1062-74.

    5. Macaluso M, Russo G., Cinti C., Bazan V., Gebbia N., and Russo A. Ras family genes: an interesting link between cell cycle and cancer. J Cell Physiol 2002;192:125- 30.

    6. Pruitt K and Der C. J. Ras and Rho regulation of the cell cycle and oncogenesis. Cancer Lett 2001;171:1-10.

    7. Barbacid M. ras genes. Annu Rev Biochem 1987;56:779-827.

    8. Burgering BM and Bos J. L. Regulation of Ras-mediated signalling: more than one way to skin a cat. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:18-22.

    9. Roskoski R, Jr. Protein prenylation: a pivotal posttranslational process. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;303:1-7.

    10. Dhillon AS and Kolch W. Untying the regulation of the Raf-1 kinase. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 2002;404:3-9.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark