Modernising a classic: Updating Leeds Beckett University’s Taxonomy of Assessment Domains to support institutional curricular change

Article English OPEN
Smith, SV ; Sellers, R (2016)

Leeds Beckett University is embarking on a new cycle of Periodic Review after our wholesale curriculum review in 2012. Reviewing our current academic activity in relation to our curricular practice showed that work still needed to be done in several key areas. For example, improving the writing of levelled intended learning outcomes (ILOs), integrating our graduate attributes (GAs) - Enterprise, Having a Global Outlook and Digital Literacy - more fully into course and module outcomes and ensuring staff understand the nature and scope of the different assessment domains which enhance opportunities for full student learning from our programmes. To address these issues, a short life working group (SLWG) focussed on modernising our existing taxonomy of assessment domains (Link 1) which had been well-used by our staff for at least 20 years. This paper focuses on i) consideration of the benefits of the existing taxonomy ii) the broader context and reasons for modifying our existing taxonomy of assessment domains, iii) the approach, process and activity of the SLWG), iv) planned future work streams to build on our work in progress. Keywords: Taxonomy of Assessment Domains, Graduate Attributes, Learning Outcomes
  • References (13)
    13 references, page 1 of 2

    Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasuan, P., Cruickshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrick, P., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. NY: Longman.

    Biggs, J. B. and Collis K. F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The Solo Taxonomy, Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes, London: Academic Press.

    Blaschke, L. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13, 1.

    Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W. & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.

    Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. Retrieved 14 February, 2016 from http://edorigami.wikispaces.com

    Dykstra, D. I. (1992). Studying Conceptual Change in Learning Physics, Science Education, 76, 615-652.

    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760605

    Gilbert, S.W. (1992). Systematic Questioning: Taxonomies that Develop Critical Thinking Skills, Science Teacher, 59(9), 41-46.

    Harris, J. (2008). Developing a language for assessing creativity: a Taxonomy for supporting student learning and assessment. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 80-87.

    Heer, R. (2012). A model of learning objectives. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    28
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Leeds Beckett University Repository - IRUS-UK 0 28
Share - Bookmark