Maximising response to postal questionnaires – A systematic review of randomised trials in health research

Article English OPEN
Gates Simon ; Jørstad-Stein Ellen C ; Hutton Jane L ; Nakash Rachel A ; Lamb Sarah E (2006)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC Medical Research Methodology (issn: 1471-2288, vol: 6, pp: 5-5)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC1421421, doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-5
  • Subject: Epidemiology | Research Article | R5-920 | Medicine (General) | R1

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Postal self-completion questionnaires offer one of the least expensive modes of collecting patient based outcomes in health care research. The purpose of this review is to assess the efficacy of methods of increasing response to postal questionnaires in health care studies on patient populations.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CDSR, PsycINFO, NRR and ZETOC. Reference lists of relevant reviews and relevant journals were hand searched. Inclusion criteria were randomised trials of strategies to improve questionnaire response in health care research on patient populations. Response rate was defined as the percentage of questionnaires returned after all follow-up efforts. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Thirteen studies reporting fifteen trials were included. Implementation of reminder letters and telephone contact had the most significant effect on response rates (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 2.30 to 5.97 p = <0.00001). Shorter questionnaires also improved response rates to a lesser degree (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.54). No evidence was found that incentives, re-ordering of questions or including an information brochure with the questionnaire confer any additional advantage.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Implementing repeat mailing strategies and/or telephone reminders may improve response to postal questionnaires in health care research. Making the questionnaire shorter may also improve response rates. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that incentives are useful. In the context of health care research all strategies to improve response to postal questionnaires require further evaluation.</p>
  • References (41)
    41 references, page 1 of 5

    1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002, 324(7347):1183-1190.

    2. Yammarino FJ, Skinner SJ, Childers TL: Understanding Mail Survey Response Behaviour - A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 1991, 55(4):613-639.

    3. Fox RJ, Crask MR, Kim J: Mail Survey Response Rate: A MetaAnalysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response. Public Opinion Quarterly 1988, 52(4):467-491.

    4. Harvey L: Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Comprehensive Literature review. Journal of the Market Research Society 1987, 29:341-353.

    5. Kanuk L: Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review. Journal of Marketing Research 1975, 12:440-453.

    6. Smeeth L, Fletcher AE: Improving the response rates to questionnaires. BMJ 2002, 324(7347):1168-1169.

    7. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J: Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 2001, 5(31):1-256.

    8. O'Cathain A: Further Analyses Would Make the Review More Helpful - Rapid Response to Edwards et al Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: Systematic Review. BMJ 2002, 324:.

    9. Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R: Why do we need some large, simple randomised trials? Stat Med 1984, 3(4):409-422.

    10. Maxim PS: Quantitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York, Oxford , Oxford University Press; 1999.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark