Characteristics of good supervision: a multi-perspective qualitative exploration of the Masters in Public Health dissertation

Article English OPEN
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ; Reilly, Jacqueline (2016)
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press
  • Journal: Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), volume 39, issue 3, pages 625-632 (issn: 1741-3842, eissn: 1741-3850)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5939875, doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw107
  • Subject: Original Article | education | employment and skills | educational settings | public health

Background: A dissertation is often a core component of the Masters in Public Health (MPH) qualification. This study aims to explore its purpose, from the perspective of both students and supervisors, and identify practices viewed as constituting good supervision.\ud \ud Methods: A multi-perspective qualitative study drawing on in-depth one-to-one interviews with MPH supervisors (n = 8) and students (n = 10), with data thematically analysed.\ud \ud Results: The MPH dissertation was viewed as providing generic as well as discipline-specific knowledge and skills. It provided an opportunity for in-depth study on a chosen topic but different perspectives were evident as to whether the project should be grounded in public health practice rather than academia. Good supervision practice was thought to require topic knowledge, generic supervision skills (including clear communication of expectations and timely feedback) and adaptation of supervision to meet student needs.\ud \ud Conclusions: Two ideal types of the MPH dissertation process were identified. Supervisor-led projects focus on achieving a clearly defined output based on a supervisor-identified research question and aspire to harmonize research and teaching practice, but often have a narrower focus. Student-led projects may facilitate greater learning opportunities and better develop skills for public health practice but could be at greater risk of course failure.
  • References (32)
    32 references, page 1 of 4

    1 Berridge V, Gorsky M, Mold A. Public Health in HistoryUnderstanding Public Health. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011.

    2 Cohen J, Robertson AM. A postgraduate public-health course: from the students' point of view. Lancet 1961;277:102-5.

    Griffiths S, Crown J, McEwen J. The role of the Faculty of Public Health (Medicine) in developing a multidisciplinary public health profession in the UK. Public Health 2007;121:420-5.

    4 Evans D, Adams L. Through the glass ceiling-and back again: the experiences of two of the first non-medical directors of public health in England. Public Health 2007;121:426-31.

    5 Pilkington P. Improving access to and provision of public health education and training in the UK. Public Health 2008;122:1047-50.

    6 Jenner D, Hill A, Greenacre J et al. Developing the public health intelligence workforce in the UK. Public Health 2010;124:248-52.

    Katikireddi SV, Higgins M, Smith KE et al. Health inequalities: the need to move beyond bad behaviours. JECH 2013;67:715-6.

    McMichael AJ, Beaglehole R. The changing global context of public health. Lancet 2000;356:495-9.

    McPherson K, Taylor S, Coyle E. For and against: public health does not need to be led by doctors. BMJ 2001;322:1593-6.

    10 El Ansari W, Oskrochi R. What matters most? Predictors of student satisfaction in public health educational courses. Public Health 2006;120:462-73.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark