Specific leaf area and leaf area index in developing stands of Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies Karst

Article English OPEN
Konopka, Bohdan ; Pajtik, Jozef ; Marusak, Robert ; Bosela, Michal ; Lukac, Martin (2016)

European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) are two of the most ecologically and economically important forest tree species in Europe. These two species co-occur in many locations in Europe, leading to direct competition for canopy space. Foliage characteristics of two naturally regenerated pure stands of beech and spruce with fully closed canopies were contrasted to assess the dynamic relationship between foliage adaptability to shading, stand LAI and tree growth. We found that individual leaf size is far more conservative in spruce than in beech. Individual leaf and needle area was larger at the top than at the bottom of the canopy in both species. Inverse relationship was found for specific leaf area (SLA), highest SLA values were found at lowest light availability under the canopy. There was no difference in leaf area index (LAI) between the two stands, however LAI increased from 10.8 to 14.6 m2m-2 between 2009 and 2011. Dominant trees of both species were more efficient in converting foliage mass or area to produce stem biomass, although this relationship changed with age and was species-specific. Overall, we found larger foliage plasticity in beech than in spruce in relation to light conditions, indicating larger capacity to exploit niche openings.
  • References (35)
    35 references, page 1 of 4

    Albrektson, A., 1984. Sapwood basal area and needle mass of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees in central Sweden. Forestry 57, 35-43.

    Aranda, I., Pardo, F., Gil, L., Pardos, J.A., 2004. Anatomical basis of the change in leaf mass per area and nitrogen investment with relative irradiance within the canopy of eight temperate tree species. Acta Oecol 25, 187-195.

    Barna, M., 2004. Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: leaf size variation. Pol J Ecol 52, 35-45.

    Bolstad, P.V., Gower, S.T., 1990. Estimation of leaf area index in fourteen southern Wisconsin forest stands using a portable radiometer. Tree Phys 7, 115-124.

    Bréda, N.J.J., 2003. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot 54, 2403-2417.

    Bussotti, F., Borghini, F., Celesti, C., Leonzio, C., Bruschi, P., 2000. Leaf morphology and macronutrients in broadleaved trees in central Italy. Trees 14, 361-368.

    Canham, C.D., 1988. Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69, 786-795.

    Chen, J.M., Rich, P.M., Gower, S.T., Norman, J.M., Plummer, S., 1997. Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012) 102, 29429-29443.

    Cienciala, E., Exnerova, Z., Schelhaas, M.J., 2008. Development of forest carbon stock and wood production in the Czech Republic until 2060. Ann For Sci 65, -.

    Claesson, S., Sahlén, K., Lundmark, T., 2001. Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. from stands in northern Sweden with high stand densities. Scand J For Res 16, 138-146.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Central Archive at the University of Reading - IRUS-UK 0 37
Share - Bookmark