Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield

Article English OPEN
Stockwell, Peter ; Mahlberg, Michaela (2015)
  • Publisher: Sage
  • Journal: Language and Literature (Harlow, England) (issn: 0963-9470, vol: 24, pp: 129-147)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5897886, doi: 10.1177/0963947015576168
  • Subject: corpus stylistics | Character | cognitive poetics | David Copperfield | Mr. Dick | Theory of Mind | mind-modelling | suspensions | Dickens | Articles | CLiC

We suggest an innovative approach to literary discourse by using corpus linguistic methods to address research questions from cognitive poetics. In this article, we focus on the way that readers engage in mind-modelling in the process of characterisation. The article sets out our cognitive poetic model of characterisation that emphasises the continuity between literary characterisation and real-life human relationships. The model also aims to deal with the modelling of the author’s mind in line with the modelling of the minds of fictional characters. Crucially, our approach to mind-modelling is text-driven. Therefore we are able to employ corpus linguistic techniques systematically to identify textual patterns that function as cues triggering character information. In this article, we explore our understanding of mind-modelling through the characterisation of Mr. Dick from David Copperfield by Charles Dickens. Using the CLiC tool (Corpus Linguistics in Cheshire) developed for the exploration of 19th-century fiction, we investigate the textual traces in non-quotations around this character, in order to draw out the techniques of characterisation other than speech presentation. We show that Mr. Dick is a thematically and authorially significant character in the novel, and we move towards a rigorous account of the reader’s modelling of authorial intention.
  • References (76)
    76 references, page 1 of 8

    Apperly I (2011) Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of 'Theory of Mind'. New York: Psychology Press.

    Belmonte MK (2008) Does the experimental scientist have a 'Theory of Mind'? Review of General Psychology 12(2): 192-204.

    Biber D (2011) Corpus linguistics and the scientific study of literature: Back to the future? Scientific Study of Literature 1(1): 15-23.

    Carpendale JIM and Lewis C (2006) How Children Develop Social Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Carter R (2004) Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.

    Cheshire 3 (n.d.) Available at: http://cheshire3.org (accessed 3 March 2015).

    CLiC (n.d.) Available at: http://clic.nottingham.ac.uk (accessed 3 March 2015).

    Crittenden C (1982) Fictional characters and logical completeness. Poetics 11(4-6): 331-344.

    Culpeper J (2001) Language and Characterisation. London: Longman.

    Currie G (2010) Narratives and Narrators. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark