The 'complementarity conjecture' - does civil society engagement strengthen input legitimacy and shape policy delivery? The case of gender mainstreaming in India and Nepal 2005-15

Article English OPEN
Chaney, Paul (2015)
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Subject: H1

This study presents critical discourse analysis of gender mainstreaming in India and Nepal. Mainstreaming is a United Nations policy objective subscribed to by 180+ states. It aims to embed gender equality concerns in every stage of the policy process. Complementarity theory emphasizes how politicians attempt to cope with complexity by engaging civil society in policy formulation, thus not only strengthening input legitimacy but also policy efficacy through the pursuit of shared cognitive maps for action. Political elites in both countries have espoused such engagement. However, the findings show that instead of securing the anticipated complementarity effects, the current practice is aligned to an instrumentalist, ‘expert-bureaucratic' policy intervention. This is because of the pronounced power asymmetry between the government and civil society. This manifests itself in marked contrasts in policy framing and issue prioritization. The overall effect is state-driven policy delivery. This undermines the capacity of the civil sphere to challenge the traditionally male-dominated power structures and hampers progress towards the normative vision of gender equality set out in the UN policy.
  • References (42)
    42 references, page 1 of 5

    Acharya, S. (2004). Democracy, gender equality and women's literacy: Experience from Nepal. UNESCO Kathmandu Series of Monographs and Working Papers No. 1. Kathmandu: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.popline.org/node/275719#sthash.uvI94QFI.dpuf

    Agnes, F. (2000). Law and gender equality: The politics of women's rights in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29, 485-514.

    Aguirre, D., & Pietropaoli, I. (2008). Gender equality, development and transitional justice: The case of Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2, 356-377.

    Alexander, J. (1998). Real civil societies, dilemmas of institutionalisation. London: Sage.

    Cole, W. (2009). Hard and soft commitments to human rights treaties, 1966-2001. Sociological Forum, 24, 563-588.

    Crenshaw, K. (2000). Gender-related aspects of race discrimination. New York: United Nations.

    Daly, M. (2005). Gender mainstreaming in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12, 433-450.

    Debusscher, P., & Ansoms, A. (2013). Gender equality policies in Rwanda: Public relations or real transformations? Development and Change, 44, 1111-1134.

    Debusscher, P., & Van der Vleuten, A. (2012). Mainstreaming gender in European Union development cooperation with sub-Saharan Africa: Promising numbers, narrow contents, telling silences. International Development Planning Review, 34, 319-338.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark