To What Extent Do Academic Staff See An E-learning Framework As Being Effective In Supporting Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) Discussions And Activities?

Article English OPEN
Thomson, S (2016)

This study examines the effectiveness of e-learning frameworks in engaging (academic) staff in the discussions and activities associated with Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) development. In particular the paper explores the effectiveness of a framework in use at Leeds Beckett University as part of the development of digital literacy as a graduate attribute. The research investigates the extent to which staff identify with the framework and the associated activities. They are required to undertake mapping exercises in order to use the framework in their own practice to support digital literacy development. A phenomenographic approach was taken in order to identify the variation in experiences staff had with regards to the e-learning framework activities. Using semi-structured interviews, evidence was gathered from which categories of variation were identified. Although participant numbers were limited this was overcome by the use of purposeful sampling. Analysis revealed that staff experienced the use of the e-learning framework in three ways: (1) as a tool for communicating their use of technology for teaching with their learners, (2) as a mechanism for mapping and sharing best practice with peers, (3) as a tool for measuring e-learning activity and reporting on it. The final outcome space identified the potential for the current framework to be expanded beyond its intended audience to other prospective stakeholders. This study also spotlights opportunities to extend this research to provide a richer evidence base and identify potential practical applications.
  • References (42)
    42 references, page 1 of 5

    Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321- 334. doi:

    Ashworth, P. D. & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the world of phenomenography? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415-431. doi:

    Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (2000). Achieving Empathy and Engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295-308. doi:

    Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Information Systems Journal.

    Blake, H. (2009). Staff perceptions of e-learning for teaching delivery in healthcare. Learning in Health and Social Care, 8(3), 223-234.

    Collier-Reed, B. I., Ingerman, Å., & Berglund, A. (2009). Reflections on trustworthiness in phenomenographic research: Recognising purpose, context and change in the process of research. Education as Change, 13(2), 339-355.

    Ellis, R. A., & Calvo, R. A. (2007). Minimum indicators to assure quality of LMS-supported blended learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 60-70.

    Elrod, P. D. E., & Tippett, D. D. (2002). The “death valley” of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(3), 273-291. doi:

    Englander, M. (2012). The Interview: Data Collection in Descriptive Phenomenological Human Scientific Research*. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 13-35.

    Gorden, R. (1998). Coding interview responses. Basic Inteviewing Skills, 180-198. Retrieved from

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Leeds Beckett University Repository - IRUS-UK 0 110
Share - Bookmark