Conceptualizing a Social Sustainability Framework for Energy Infrastructure Decisions

Article English OPEN
whitton, john ; Parry, Ioan (2015)

The concept of social sustainability is discussed in a wide range of literatures, from urban planning to international development. Authors agree a notion of social sustainability is difficult to define, comprising numerous component parts (criteria), such as community cohesion, human wellbeing, effective dialogue and the access that citizens have to those that make important decisions on their behalf. The definition and measurement of these criteria and the role of social sustainability in energy decision making is a contentious issue. We argue that a community led, asset based approach is required to achieve any sense of how social sustainability can be defined in a community setting within the context of energy developments. We propose a conceptual framework based on a process of community group prioritization and visioning. Our earlier research on public participation and the role of dialogue for nuclear energy development in the UK, US and Japan is used to demonstrate barriers to be overcome if our systemic model of social sustainability is to become a reality. We highlight the importance of fairness and justice, place based approaches and socio-energy systems, concluding that these are necessary to promote a community and institutional awareness of social sustainability for large energy developments.
  • References (119)
    119 references, page 1 of 12

    [1] Ames S. Community visioning. In: Steiner FR, Butler K, editors. Planning and urban design standards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2006. p. 39-40.

    [2] Cuthill M. Strengthening the 'social' in sustainable development: developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustain Dev 2010;18:362-73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.397.

    [3] Lapachelle P, Emery M, Hays RL. The pedagogy and the practice of community visioning: evaluating effective community strategic planning in rural Montana. Commun Dev 2010;41(2):176-91.

    [4] McKinlay P. The challenge of democratic participation in the community development process. Commun Dev J 2006;41(4):492-505.

    [5] Murtagh B. City visioning and the turn to community: the case of Derry/Londonderry. Plan Pract Res 2001;16(1):9-19.

    [6] Webler T, Tuler S, Kreuger R. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environ Manag 2001;27(3):435-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002670010160.

    [7] Magis K, Shinn C. Emergent themes of social sustainability. In: Dillard J, Dujon V, King MC, editors. Understanding the social aspect of sustainability. New York: Routledge; 2009.

    [8] Whitton J. Stakeholder participation for the Legacy Ponds and Legacy Silos (LP&LS) facility at Sellafield, Cumbria, UK: the nature and effectiveness of the dialogue. In: Proceedings of ICEM '09. 2009.

    [9] Whitton J. Participant perceptions on the nature of stakeholder dialogue carried out by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) [Ph.D. thesis]. UK: University of Manchester; 2010.

    [10] Walker BJA, Wiersma B, Bailey E. Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: an experimental study in England. Energy Res Soc Sci 2014;3:46-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    78
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Central Lancashire Online Knowledge - IRUS-UK 0 78
Share - Bookmark