Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture

Article English OPEN
Jansson, E. ; Wilson, A.D. ; Williams, J.H.G. ; Mon-Williams, M. (2007)

Recent behavioural research has investigated whether viewing someone perform an action results in activation of that action by the observer. Postulated empirical support for this ‘ideo-motor (IM) conjecture’ typically rests upon two types of experimental paradigm (reaction time and movement tracking tasks). These paradigms purport to show movement facilitation when compatible movements are observed and vice versa, but only for biological stimuli. Unfortunately, these paradigms often contain confounding (and unavoidable) generic stimulus–response compatibility effects that are not restricted to observed human movement. The current study demonstrates in three experiments that equivalent compatibility effects can be produced by non-biological stimuli. These results suggest that existing empirical paradigms may not, and perhaps cannot, support the IM-conjecture. \ud
  • References (8)

    Aicken, M.D., Wilson, A.D., Williams, J.H.G., Mon-Williams M. (2007). Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times. Brain & Cognition 63, 304-308.

    Brass, M. and Heyes, C. (2005) Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 489-495.

    Brass, M., Bekkering, H. and Prinz, W. (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106, 3-22.

    Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., Matthes-von Cramon, G., and von Cramon, D. Y. (2003). Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychology, 17, 265-271.

    De Jong, R. (1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task incertainty. Acta Psychologica, 88, 187-207.

    Fitts, P. M. and Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 199-210.

    Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284-288

    Wilson, M, & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460-473.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark