The Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine as Irrigant Solutions for Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Article English OPEN
Gonçalves, L.S. ; Rodrigues, R.C.V. ; Andrade Junior, C.V. ; Soares, R.G. ; Vettore, M. (2016)
  • Publisher: Elsevier

Introduction\ud \ud This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine for root canal disinfection during root canal therapy.\ud \ud Methods\ud \ud A literature search for clinical trials was made on the PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Knowledge, SCOPUS, and Science Direct databases and in the reference lists of the identified articles up to January 2015. Quality assessment of the selected studies was performed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement.\ud \ud Results\ud \ud One clinical trial and 4 randomized clinical trials were selected from the 172 articles initially identified. There was heterogeneity in the laboratory methods used to assess the root canal disinfection as well as in the concentrations of the irrigants used. Therefore, meta-analysis was not performed. Two studies reported effective and similar reductions in bacterial levels for both irrigants. Sodium hypochlorite was more effective than chlorhexidine in reducing microorganisms in 1 study, and another reported opposite findings. Both root irrigants were ineffective in eliminating endotoxins from necrotic pulp root canals in 1 study. Trial design and information regarding randomization procedures were not clearly described in the clinical trials. No study compared laboratory results with clinical outcomes.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud The available evidence on this topic is scarce, and the findings of studies were not consistent. Additional randomized clinical trials using clinical outcomes to compare the use of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine during root canal therapy are needed.
  • References (16)
    16 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjögren U, Sundqvist G. Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987;3: 58-65.

    2. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30:297 306.

    3. Regan JD, Fleury AA. Irrigants in non-surgical endodontic treatment. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2006 Autumn;52:84-92.

    4. Zehnder M. Root Canal Irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32:389-98.

    5. D'Arcangelo C, Varvara G, Fazio PD. An evaluation of the action of different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobic-anaerobic, obligate anaerobic, and microaerophilic bacteria. J Endod 1999; 25:351 3.

    6. Wong DTS, Cheung GSP. Extension of Bactericidal Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite into Dentinal Tubules. J Endod 2014; 40:825-9.

    7. Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr. Identification of bacteria enduring endodontic treatment procedures by a combined reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction and reverse-capture checkerboard approach. J Endod 2010;36:45-52.

    8. Gordon TM, Damato D, Christner P. Solvent effect of various dilutions ofsodium hypochlorite on vital and necrotic tissue. J Endod 1981;7:466 9.

    15. Siqueira JF Jr, Batista MM, Fraga RC, de Uzeda M. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 1998;24:414-6.

    39. Rodrigues RC, Antunes HS, Neves MA, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Infection control in retreatment cases: in vivo antibacterial effects of two instrumentation systems. J Endod 2015;41:1600-05.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 292
Share - Bookmark