Theorising and practitioners in HRD: the role of abductive reasoning

Article English OPEN
Gold, J (2011)
  • Publisher: Emerald

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to argue that abductive reasoning is a typical but usually unrecognised process used by HRD scholars and practitioners alike. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper that explores recent criticism of traditional views of theory-building, based on the privileging of scientific theorising, which has led to a relevance gap between scholars and practitioners. The work of Charles Sanders Peirce and the varieties of an abductive reasoning process are considered. Findings – Abductive reasoning, which precedes induction and deduction, provide a potential connection with HRD practitioners who face difficult problems. Two types of abductive reasoning are explored – existential and analogic. Both offer possibilities for theorising with HRD practitioners. A range of methods for allowing abduction to become more evident with practitioners are presented. The authors consider how abduction can be used in engaged and participative research strategies. Research limitations/implications – While this is a conceptual paper, it does suggest implications for engagement and participation in theorising with HRD practitioners. Practical implications – Abductive reasoning adds to the repertoire of HRD scholars and practitioners. Originality/value – The paper elucidates the value of abductive reasoning and points to how it can become an integral element of theory building in HRD.
  • References (46)
    46 references, page 1 of 5

    Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Aram, J.D., & Salipante, P.F. (2003). Bridging Scholarship In Management: Epistemological Reflections. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 189-205.

    Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

    Bennis, W., & O'Toole, J. (2005). How Business Schools Lost Their Way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-104.

    Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell

    Bereiter, C. (1985). Towards A Solution Of The Learning Paradox. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 201-226.

    Blaikie, N. W.H. (2007). Approaches to Social Enquiry, (2nd edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Blaikie, N.W.H. (2009). Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation, (2nd edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Carr, A., Durant, R., & Downs, A. (2004). Emergent Strategy Development, Abduction, And Pragmatism: New Lessons For Corporations. Human Systems Management, 23(2), 79-91.

    Chiu, L. F., (2006). Critical Reflection: More Than Nuts And Bolts. Action Research, I4(2), 165-182.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Leeds Beckett University Repository - IRUS-UK 0 286
Share - Bookmark