Mathematical evaluation of community level impact of combining bed nets and indoor residual spraying upon malaria transmission in areas where the main vectors are Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes

Article English OPEN
Okumu, Fredros O ; Kiware, Samson S ; Moore, Sarah J ; Killeen, Gerry F (2013)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: Parasites & Vectors, volume 6, pages 17-17 (issn: 1756-3305, eissn: 1756-3305)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3564902, doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-17
  • Subject: wc_750 | RC109-216 | Infectious Diseases | wa_110 | Infectious and parasitic diseases | wa_240 | qx_515 | Vector control | Research | Parasitology | qu_26.5
    mesheuropmc: parasitic diseases

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Indoor residual insecticide spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) are commonly used together even though evidence that such combinations confer greater protection against malaria than either method alone is inconsistent.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A deterministic model of mosquito life cycle processes was adapted to allow parameterization with results from experimental hut trials of various combinations of untreated nets or LLINs (Olyset®, PermaNet 2.0®, Icon Life® nets) with IRS (pirimiphos methyl, lambda cyhalothrin, DDT), in a setting where vector populations are dominated by <it>Anopheles arabiensis</it>, so that community level impact upon malaria transmission at high coverage could be predicted.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Intact untreated nets alone provide equivalent personal protection to all three LLINs. Relative to IRS plus untreated nets, community level protection is slightly higher when Olyset® or PermaNet 2.0® nets are added onto IRS with pirimiphos methyl or lambda cyhalothrin but not DDT, and when Icon Life® nets supplement any of the IRS insecticides. Adding IRS onto any net modestly enhances communal protection when pirimiphos methyl is sprayed, while spraying lambda cyhalothrin enhances protection for untreated nets but not LLINs. Addition of DDT reduces communal protection when added to LLINs.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Where transmission is mediated primarily by <it>An. arabiensis,</it> adding IRS to high LLIN coverage provides only modest incremental benefit (e.g. when an organophosphate like pirimiphos methyl is used), but can be redundant (e.g. when a pyrethroid like lambda cyhalothin is used) or even regressive (e.g. when DDT is used for the IRS). Relative to IRS plus untreated nets, supplementing IRS with LLINs will only modestly improve community protection. Beyond the physical protection that intact nets provide, additional protection against transmission by <it>An. arabiensis</it> conferred by insecticides will be remarkably small, regardless of whether they are delivered as LLINs or IRS. The insecticidal action of LLINs and IRS probably already approaches their absolute limit of potential impact upon this persistent vector so personal protection of nets should be enhanced by improving the physical integrity and durability. Combining LLINs and non-pyrethroid IRS in residual transmission systems may nevertheless be justified as a means to manage insecticide resistance and prevent potential rebound of not only <it>An. arabiensis</it>, but also more potent, vulnerable and historically important species such as <it>Anopheles gambiae</it> and <it>Anopheles funestus</it>.</p>
  • References (53)
    53 references, page 1 of 6

    1. WHO: World Malaria Report 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

    2. Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Walker N, Cibulskis RE, Yukich JO, Zikusooka CM, Steketee RW: Estimates of child deaths prevented from malaria prevention scale-up in Africa 2001-2010. Malaria J 2010, 11:93.

    3. Okumu FO, Moore SJ: Combining indoor residual spraying and insecticidetreated nets for malaria control in Africa: a review of possible outcomes and an outline of suggestions for the future. Malaria J 2011, 10:208.

    4. Corbel V, Akogbeto M, Damien GB, Djenontin A, Chandre F, Rogier C, Moiroux N, Chabi J, Padonou GG, Henry MC: Combination of malaria vector control interventions in pyrethroid resistance area in Benin: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2012, 3099:70081-70086.

    5. Hamel MJ, Otieno P, Bayoh N, Kariuki S, Were V, Marwanga D, Laserson KF, Williamson J, Slutsker L, Gimnig J: The Combination of indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets provides added protection against malaria compared with insecticide-treated nets alone. Am J Top Med Hyg 2011, 85:1080-1086.

    6. Ngufor C, N'Guessan R, Boko P, Odjo A, Vigninou E, Asidi AN, Akogbeto M, Rowland M: Combining indoor residual spraying with chlorfenapyr and long lasting insecticidal bednets for improved control of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae: an experimental hut trial in Benin. Malaria J 2011, 10:343.

    7. Kleinschmidt I, Schwabe C, Shiva M, Segura JL, Sima V, Mabunda SJA, Coleman M: Combining indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated net interventions. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2009, 81:519.

    8. Chitnis N, Schapira A, Smith T, Steketee R: Comparing the effectiveness of malaria vector-control interventions through a mathematical model. Am J Top Med Hyg 2010, 83:230.

    9. Yakob L, Dunning R, Yan G: Indoor Residual Spray and Insecticide Treated bednets for malaria control: theoretical synergisms and antagonisms. J Roy Soc: Interface 2010, 1. doi:10.1098.

    10. Griffin JT, Hollingsworth TD, Okell LC, Churcher TS, White M, Hinsley W, Bousema T, Drakeley CJ, Ferguson NM, Basáñez MG: Reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in Africa: a model-based evaluation of intervention strategies. PLoS Med 2010, 7:8.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark