The Feasibility of Health Trainer Improved Patient Self-Management in Patients with Low Health Literacy and Poorly Controlled Diabetes: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

Article English OPEN
Protheroe, J ; Rathod, T ; Bartlam, B ; Rowlands, G ; Richardson, G ; Reeves, D (2016)
  • Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
  • Journal: Journal of Diabetes Research, volume 2,016 (issn: 2314-6745, eissn: 2314-6753)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5090087, doi: 10.1155/2016/6903245
  • Subject: 2712 | Research Article | RC648-665 | 1310 | RA0421 | Diseases of the endocrine glands. Clinical endocrinology | Article Subject | R1

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is most prevalent in deprived communities and patients with low health literacy have worse glycaemic control and higher rates of diabetic complications. However, recruitment from this patient population into intervention trials is highly challenging. We conducted a study to explore the feasibility of recruitment and to assess the effect of a lay health trainer intervention, in patients with low health literacy and poorly controlled diabetes from a socioeconomically disadvantaged population, compared with usual care. Methods. A pilot RCT comparing the LHT intervention with usual care. Patients with HbA1c > 7.5 (58mmol/mol) were recruited. Baseline and 7-month outcome data were entered directly onto a laptop to reduce patient burden. Results. 76 patients were recruited; 60.5% had low health literacy and 75% were from the most deprived areas of England. Participants in the LHT arm had significantly improved mental health (푝 = 0.049) and illness perception (푝 = 0.040). The intervention was associated with lower resource use, better patient self-care management, and better QALY profile at 7-month follow-up. Conclusion. This study describes successful recruitment strategies for hard-to-reach populations. Further research is warranted for this cost-effective, relatively low-cost intervention for a population currently suffering a disproportionate burden of diabetes, to demonstrate its sustained impact on treatment effects, health, and health inequalities.
  • References (37)
    37 references, page 1 of 4

    [1] Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety, Quality and Outcomes Framework, Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2014-2015.

    [2] Scottish Diabetes Survey Monitoring Group, National Diabetes Audit Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets, 2012-2013.

    [3] Health Survey for England. (2011, 01.04.2016), Chapter 4,

    [4] J. Tuomilehto, J. Lindstro¨m, J. G. Eriksson et al., “Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance,” eTh New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 18, pp. 1343-1350, 2001.

    [5] All Party Parliamentary Group for Diabetes and Diabetes UK, Diabetes and the Disadvantaged: Reducing Health Inequalities in the UK: World Diabetes Day 14 November 2006, 2006.

    [6] C. E. Nasr, B. J. Hoogwerf, C. Faiman, and S. S. K. Reddy, “Eefcts of glucose and blood pressure control on complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 247-253, 1999.

    [7] I. M. Stratton, A. I. Adler, H. A. W. Neil et al., “Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7258, pp. 405-412, 2000.

    [8] Diabetes UK, Smoking and Diabetes, 2016, https://www Living-my-life/Smoking/.

    [9] Diabetes UK, Diabetes: Treatment and Your Health: Eating with Diabetes, 2016,

    [10] G. Rowlands, J. Protheroe, J. Winkley, M. Richardson, P. T. Seed, and R. Rudd, “A mismatch between population health literacy

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark