The reliability and validity of a revised version of the How I Think Questionnaire for men who have intellectual disabilities

Article English OPEN
Daniel, M.R. ; Sadek, S.A. ; Langdon, Peter E. (2018)
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284217
  • Subject: BF

The aim of the current study was to revise an existing measure of distorted cognitions, creating the How I Think Questionnaire – Intellectual Disabilities (HIT-IDs), and to investigate the reliability and validity of the revised questionnaire. To achieve our aims, we recruited 97 men with intellectual disabilities (IDs), with or without a history of engaging in criminal behaviour, and interviewed them on two occasions, inviting them to complete the HIT-IDs, along with measures of moral development and empathy. The results indicated that the internal consistency of the HIT-IDs was acceptable, and the test-retest reliability was good. The HIT-IDs discriminated well between offenders and non-offenders, and as expected, correlated positively with a measure of moral development and negatively with a measure of empathy. The HIT-IDs is a reliable and valid measure for use with men who have IDs.
  • References (34)
    34 references, page 1 of 4

    Axelrod, B. N. (2002). Validity of the Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence and other very short forms of estimating intellectual functioning. Assessment, 9(1), 17-23.

    Bacchini, D., De Angelis, G., Affuso, G., & Brugman, D. (2015). The Structure of Self-Serving Cognitive Distortions A Validation of the “How I Think” Questionnaire in a Sample of Italian Adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 0748175615596779.

    Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163-175.

    Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163-175.

    Barriga, A. Q., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial youth: Development and preliminary validation of the “How I Think” questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 22(5), 333-343.

    Barriga, A. Q., Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Liau, A. K. (2001). How I Think (HIT) Questionnaire manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

    Bear, G. G., & Rys, G. S. (1994). Moral reasoning, classroom behavior, and sociometric status among elementry school children. Developmental Psychology, 30, 633-638.

    Buell, S., Langdon, P. E., Bunning, K., & Pounds, G. (2016). The effects of linguistic simpliÞcation and mediation on the comprehension of adapted (‘easy read’) text by people with intellectual disabilities: A randomised experiment. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 644- 644.

    Buell, S., Pounds, G., Bunning, K., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). Easy Read: simplification or reduction? Critical differences in the discourse of UK Department of Health adapted'easy read'literature for people with intellectual disabilities and their ‘non-easy read’equivalents. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 645-645.

    Fernández, M. E. P., Rodríguez, J. M. A., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Psychometrical properties of the" How I Think" Questionnaire (HIT-Q) in adolescents. Psicothema, 25(4), 542-548.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Kent Academic Repository - IRUS-UK 0 60
Share - Bookmark