Mutual obligation? Regulating by supervision and surveillance in Australian income support policy

Article English OPEN
Parker, Stephen ; Fopp, Rodney (2005)
  • Publisher: Surveillance Studies Network
  • Subject: H1 | HV

Through an analysis of speeches by government ministers, documents and regulations, this article\ud examines the Australian national government’s surveillance of unemployed people through what\ud is known as Activity Testing, and more specifically as Mutual Obligation. It seeks to merge\ud the social policy analysis of Mutual Obligation with a surveillance perspective in order to delve\ud deeper into the underlying nature of the policy and its implications for people who are\ud unemployed. It does this by 1. Outlining the neo-liberal political theory underlying these policies;\ud 2. Illustrating the nature and extent of surveillance of people in receipt of income support, and 3.\ud Employing Foucault’s concepts of the technologies of domination and the self to highlight the\ud controlling and coercive aspects of Mutual Obligation in achieving certain of the Government’s\ud political and policy objectives. In doing so, the analysis will make visible something of the power\ud exerted over the disadvantaged while subject to such surveillance.
  • References (64)
    64 references, page 1 of 7

    Abbott, T. (2000) 'The Dole is a State of Mind: Welfare Mentality Kills Job Aspirations', The Australian, Tuesday 8th August 2000, 13.

    Abbott, T. (2001) Making Work Pay - The Trouble With the Welfare State, CD Kemp Memorial Lecture, 12th June, 2001, last accessed 14th July 2003, <http://www.ipa.org.au/Speechesandsubmssns/AbbottCDK2001.html>

    Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS( (2001) Breaching the Safety Net: the Harsh Impact of Social Security Penalties, ACOSS Information Sheet 305, 13 August 2001, last accessed 23rd July 2004, <http://www.acoss.org.au/info/2001/305x.htm>

    ACOSS (2001) New Research: Hardship Intensifies From Rise in Social Security Penalties, ACOSS Media Release, 13 August 2001, last accessed 23rd July 2004, <http://www.acoss.org.au/media/2001/mr0813.htm>

    ACOSS (2002) New Freedom of Information Data Shows: $200m in 'Fines' Push Unemployed and Students Deep Into Poverty, ACOSS media release, 5 August 2002, last accessed 23rd July 2004, <http://www.acoss.org.au/media/2002/mr0805_breach.htm>

    Bardach, E. (1997) Implementing a Paternalist Welfare -to-Work Program. In L. M. Mead (ed.), The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty , Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 248-278.

    Bessant, J. (2002) The Politics of Official Talk about Welfare Reform in Australia, Just Policy, No.28, December 2002, 12-22.

    Carney, T. & Ramia, G, (2002) Mutuality, Mead and McClure: More 'Big M's' for the Unemployed?, Australian Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 37, No. 3, August 2002, 277-300.

    Centrelink (2002) Centrelink's Compliance Activity for Family and Community Services, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002, last accessed 27th May 2004, <http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/filestores/compliance01_02/$file/compliance01_ 02.pdf>

    Centrelink (2003a) Factors - Assessable Income , last accessed 23rd July 2004, <http://www.centrelink.gov.au/internet/internet.nsf/factors/income_assessable.htm>

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark