Use of quality information in decision-making about health and social care services - a systematic review
- Publisher: Wiley
User choice and personalisation have been at the centre of health and\ud social care policies in many countries. Exercising choice can be especially\ud challenging for people with long-term conditions (LTC) or disabilities.\ud Information about the quality, cost and availability of services is central\ud to user choice. This study used systematic review methods to synthesise\ud evidence in three main areas: (i) how people with LTC or disabilities and\ud their family carers ﬁnd and access information about the quality of\ud services; (ii) how quality information is used in decision-making; and\ud (iii) what type of quality information is most useful. Quality information\ud was deﬁned broadly and could include formal quality reports (e.g.\ud inspection reports, report cards, etc.), information about the characteristics\ud of a service or provider (e.g. number and qualiﬁcations of staff, facilities,\ud etc.) and informal reports about quality (e.g. personal experience, etc.).\ud Literature searches were carried out using electronic databases in January\ud 2012. Thirteen papers reporting ﬁndings from empirical studies published\ud between 2001 and 2012 were included in the review. The majority of\ud papers (n = 9) had a qualitative design. The analysis highlighted the use\ud of multiple sources of information in decision-making about services and\ud in particular the importance of informal sources and extended social\ud networks in accessing information. There is limited awareness and use of\ud ‘ofﬁcial’ and online information sources. Service users or family carers\ud place greater emphasis on general information and structural indicators.\ud Clinical or quality-of-life outcomes are often difﬁcult to interpret and\ud apply. Trust emerged a key issue in relation to quality information.\ud Experiential and subjective information is highly valued and trusted.\ud Various barriers to the effective use of quality information in making\ud choices about services are identiﬁed. Implications for policy and future\ud research are discussed.
16 references, page 1 of 2
views in local repository
downloads in local repository
The information is available from the following content providers: