Is acupuncture a useful adjunct to physiotherapy for older adults with knee pain?: The "Acupuncture, Physiotherapy and Exercise" (APEX) study [ISRCTN88597683]

Article English OPEN
Hay, Elaine ; Barlas, Panos ; Foster, Nadine ; Hill, Jonathan ; Thomas, Elaine ; Young, Julie (2004)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, volume 5, pages 31-31 (issn: 1471-2474, eissn: 1471-2474)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-31, pmc: PMC520743
  • Subject: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine | Diseases of the musculoskeletal system | RC925-935 | Study Protocol | RA

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Acupuncture is a popular non-pharmacological modality for treating musculoskeletal pain. Physiotherapists are one of the largest groups of acupuncture providers within the NHS, and they commonly use it alongside advice and exercise. Conclusive evidence of acupuncture's clinical effectiveness and its superiority over sham interventions is lacking. The Arthritis Research Campaign (<b>arc</b>) has funded this randomised sham-controlled trial which addresses three important questions. Firstly, we will determine the additional benefit of true acupuncture when used by physiotherapists alongside advice and exercise for older people presenting to primary care with knee pain. Secondly, we will evaluate sham acupuncture in the same way. Thirdly, we will investigate the treatment preferences and expectations of both the participants and physiotherapists participating in the study, and explore the effect of these on clinical outcome. We will thus investigate whether acupuncture is a useful adjunct to advice and exercise for treating knee pain and gain insight into whether this effect is due to specific needling properties.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>This randomised clinical trial will recruit 350 participants with knee pain to three intervention arms. It is based in 43 community physiotherapy departments in 21 NHS Trusts in the West Midlands and Cheshire regions in England. Patients aged 50 years and over with knee pain will be recruited. Outcome data will be collected by self-complete questionnaires before randomisation, and 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation and by telephone interview 2 weeks after treatment commences. The questionnaires collect demographic details as well as information on knee-related pain, movement and function, pain intensity and affect, main functional problem, illness perceptions, self-efficacy, treatment preference and expectations, general health and quality of life. Participants are randomised to receive a package of advice and exercise; or this package plus real acupuncture; or this package plus sham acupuncture. Treatment details are being collected on a standard proforma. Interventions are delivered by experienced physiotherapists who have all received training in acupuncture to recognised national standards. The primary analysis will investigate the main treatment effects of real or sham acupuncture as an adjunct to advice and exercise.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This paper presents detail on the rationale, design, methods, and operational aspects of the trial.</p>
  • References (68)
    68 references, page 1 of 7

    McAlindon TE, Cooper C, Kirwan JR, Dieppe PA: Knee pain and disability in the community. Br J Rheumatol 1992, 31:189-192.

    2. O'Reilly SC, Muir KR, Doherty M: Screening for pain in knee osteoarthritis: which question? Ann Rheum Dis 1996, 55:931-933.

    3. Scott DL, Shipley M, Dawson A, Edwards S, Symmons DP, Woolf AD: The clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: strategies for improving clinical effectiveness. Br J Rheumatol 1998, 37:546-554.

    4. Hawley DJ, Wolfe F: Pain, disability, and pain/disability relationships in seven rheumatic disorders: a study of 1,522 patients. J Rheumatol 1991, 18:1552-1557.

    5. Creamer P, Flores R, Hochberg MC: Management of osteoarthritis in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 1998, 14:435-454.

    6. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, Clark BM, Dieppe PA, Griffin MR, Moskowitz RW, Schnitzer TJ: Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1995, 38:1541-1546.

    7. Lane NE, Thompson JM: Management of osteoarthritis in the primary-care setting: an evidence-based approach to treatment. Am J Med 1997, 103:25S-30S.

    8. Altman RD, Lozada CJ: Practice guidelines in the management of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998, 6:22-24.

    9. The Primary Care Rheumatology Society: The management of osteoarthritis - Guidelines 1999 [http://www.pcrsociety.com/guidelines/ management_osteoarthritis.html].

    10. Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, Dittus RS, Freund DA, Lubitz R, Hawker G, Eckert G: Comparison of general internists, family physicians, and rheumatologists managing patients with symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Care Res 1997, 10:289-299.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark