Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision

Article English OPEN
Wolffsohn, James S. ; Bhogal, Gurpreet ; Shah, Sunil (2011)

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of uncorrected astigmatism in older adults. SETTING: University Vision Clinic METHOD: Twenty-one healthy presbyopes, aged 58.9±2.8 years, had astigmatism of 0.0 to -4.0 x 90?DC and -3.0DC of cylinder at 90?, 180? and 45? induced with spectacle lenses, with the mean spherical equivalent compensated to plano, in random order. Visual acuity was assessed binocularly using a computerised test chart at 95%, 50% and 10% contrast. Near acuity and reading speed were measured using standardised reading texts. Light scatter was quantified with the cQuant and driving reaction times with a computer simulator. Finally visual clarity of a mobile phone and computer screen was subjectively rated. RESULTS: Distance visual acuity decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (F=174.50, p<0.001) and was reduced at lower contrasts (F=170.77, p<0.001). Near visual acuity and reading speed also decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatism power (p<0.001). Light scatter was not significantly affected by uncorrected astigmatism (p>0.05), but the reliability and variability of measurements decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (p<0.05). Driving simulator performance was also unaffected by uncorrected astigmatism (p>0.05), but subjective rating of clarity decreased with increasing uncorrected astigmatic power (p<0.001). Uncorrected astigmatism at 45? or 180? orientation resulted in a worse distance and near visual acuity, and subjective rated clarity than 90? orientation (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Uncorrected astigmatism, even as low as 1.0DC, causes a significant burden on a patient’s vision. If left uncorrected, this could impact significantly on their independence, quality of life and wellbeing.
  • References (8)

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1111-1119.

    Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Mico R, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Cervino A. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. J Cat Ref Surg 2009;35:70-75.

    Morgan PB, Efron N. Prescribing soft contact lenses for astigmatism. Contact Lens Ant Eye 2009;32:97-98.

    Black A, Wood J. Vision and falls. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:212-222.

    Lotery A, Xu X, Zlatava G, Loftus J. Burden of illness, visual impairment and health resource utilisation of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the UK cohort of a five-country cross-sectional study. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1303-1307.

    Hahn GA, Penka D, Gehrlich C, Messias A, Weismann M, Hyvärinen L, Leinonen M, Freely M, Rubin G, Dauxerre C, Vital-Durand F, Featherston S, Dietz K, TrauzettelKlosinski S. New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:480-484.

    Yehezkel O, Belkin M, Sagi D, Polat U. Adaptation to monocular astigmatic distortion by conflicting binocular input. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:S5632.

    Monestam E, Lundqvist B. Long-time results and associations between subjective visual difficulties with car driving and objective visual function 5 years after cataract surgery. J Cat Refract Surg 2006;32:50-55.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Aston Publications Explorer - IRUS-UK 0 2,106
Share - Bookmark