Audit of the job satisfaction levels of the UK radiography and physics workforce in UK radiotherapy centres 2012

Other literature type, Article English OPEN
Hutton, D ; Beardmore, C ; Patel, I ; Massey, J ; Wong, H ; Probst, Heidi
  • Publisher: British Institute of Radiology
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130742
  • Subject: Full Paper
    mesheuropmc: education

<p>Conclusion: Radiotherapy professionals are prone to the effects of compassion fatigue and burnout. Attention must be paid to workload and its impact on practitioners' job satisfaction. Professional development that is supported and informed by a performance development review is a simple and effective means of enhancing satisfaction. Individuals have a responsibility to themselves and their colleagues as their behaviours and attitudes influence job satisfaction.</p>\ud <p>Advances in knowledge: This work identifies areas for future research to enhance the professional resilience of practitioners, in order to provide high-quality treatments.</p>\ud <p>Objective: Workforce planning reports identify a staff shortfall that jeopardizes the ability of UK radiotherapy centres to meet future demands. Obtaining an understanding of the work experiences of radiotherapy professionals will support the development of strategies to increase job satisfaction, productivity and effectiveness.</p>\ud <p>Methods: A quantitative survey assessed job satisfaction, attitudes to incident reporting, stress and burnout, opportunities for professional development, workload, retention and turnover. Clinical oncologists were not included, as the Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK, had recently assessed their members' satisfaction. All questions were taken from validated instruments or adapted from the "UK National Health Service Staff Survey".</p>\ud <p>Results: The survey yielded 658 completed responses (approximately 16% response rate), from public and private sectors. Over a third (36%) of respondents were classified as satisfied for job satisfaction with 11% dissatisfied and the remaining 53% ambivalent. A significant proportion of clinical staff (37.5%) report high emotional exhaustion. Presenteeism was an issue with 42.4% attending work despite feeling unable to fulfil their role.</p>
  • References (74)
    74 references, page 1 of 8

    1. RCR. Equipment, workload and staffing for radiotherapy in the UK 1997-2002. [updated 12 May 2013]. Available from: http://www. PageID5149&PublicationID5185.

    2. Scottish Government Health Department. Radiotherapy activity planning for Scotland 2011-2015. 2005. Available from: Resource/Doc/90297/0021749.pdf

    3. Cancer Services Co-ordinating Group, Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Advisory Group. Radiotherapy equipment needs and workforce implications 2006-2016. Cardiff; UK: Cancer Services Co-ordinating Group, 2006.

    4. National Radiotherapy Advisory Group Workforce Sub-Group. Radiotherapy provision in England. 2007.

    5. Radiotherapy patient access survey. 2012. [Cited 15 June 2013] Available from: http:// 20130513211237/ sites/default/files/work-docs/ 1530_tim_cooper.pdf

    6. National Audit Office report. Managing high value capital equipment in the NHS in England. 2011.

    7. Department of Health Radiotherpay Services in England. 2012. [Published 6 November 2012, cited 15 June 2013]. Available from:

    8. Workforce integrated planning Toolkit (WIPT). [updated 12 May 2013]. Available from: http:// 20130513211237/ #tab-workforceintegratedplanningtoolwipt

    9. The Malthus programme. [updated 27 October 2013, cited 11 November 2013]. Available from: malthus/

    10. Radiotherapy Data Set (RTDS). [Cited 25 May 2013] Available from:

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark