Physician assistants in English general practice: a qualitative study of employers' viewpoints

Article English OPEN
Drennan, Vari ; Levenson, Ros ; Halter, Mary ; Tye, Chris (2011)

OBJECTIVE: Effective use of staff is a major aim in all health-care systems both to maximize their impact and to minimize costs. In England, a few general practitioners (GPs) have been recruiting physician assistants (PAs) to work in their practices, independent of any pilot schemes. Our objective was to study the motivation of GPs and practice managers who employed PAs and to understand the factors that sustained their employment. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, analysed thematically, was carried out with 13 GPs and three practice managers from 15 general practices employing PAs in five areas of England. RESULTS: All practices were employing USA-trained PAs. Motivating factors for their employment included increasing the general practice capacity to manage patient demand within government targets for access, broaden the skill-mix in the practice team and financial considerations. The issues that needed to be taken into account in employing PAs included: the requirement for medical supervision; the PAs current lack of a regulatory framework and prescribing authority; and some patients' lack of familiarity with the concept of the PA. CONCLUSIONS: General practice employers view PAs as a positive addition to a mixed skill team for meeting patient demand within a practice's finances. There is a need to develop stronger governance and regulatory frameworks for this emerging profession.
  • References (38)
    38 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Dal Poz M, Quain E, O'Neil M, McCaffery J, Elzinga G, Martineau T. Addressing the health workforce crisis: towards a common approach. Human Resources for Health 2006; 4: 21.

    2. Department of Health. Human Resources in the NHS Plan: More Staff Working Differently. London: Department of Health, 2002.

    3. Mittman DE, Cawley JF, Fenn WH. Physician assistants in the United States. BMJ 2002; 325:485-7

    4. Scheffler RM, Gillings DB. Survey approach to estimating demand for physician assistants. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 1039-47.

    5. National Centre for Health Statistics. Health, United States 2008. Washington: National Centre for Health Statistics, 2009.

    6. Ruby EB, Davidson LJ, Daly B et al: Care activities and outcomes of patients cared for by acute care nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and resident physicians: a comparison. Am J Crit Care 1998; 7:267­81

    7. Cawley JF, Rohrs FC, Hooker RS: Physician assistants and malpractice risk: findings from the national practitioner data bank. Fed Bull 1999; 85:242­6

    8. Hooker RS, Cipher DJ, Sekscenski E. Patient satisfaction with physician assistant, nurse practitioner, and physician care: a national survey of Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Outcomes Manag 2005; 12:88-92

    9. Larson E, Hart LG, Ballweg R: National Estimates of Physician Assistant Productivity. J Allied Health 2001; 30:146-152

    10. Roblin DW, Howard DH, Becker ER, Adams EK, Roberts MH. Use of midlevel practitioners to achieve labor cost savings in the primary care practice of an MCO. Health Serv Res 2004; 39:607-625

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Kingston University Research Repository - IRUS-UK 0 65
Share - Bookmark