It is nobbut (only and oligarchy that calls itself a 'we': perceptions of journalists and journalism in Britain 1880-1900

Article English OPEN
Conboy, M.D. (2016)
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis

The period between 1880 and 1900 was rich with discussions of the role of both journalists and journalism in Britain. Not only did the period witness the intensification and systematization of technologies associated with the gathering and dissemination of news but it was also a time when journalists were beginning to identify themselves collectively and professionally. The technological developments and corresponding professional reassessment provided the periodicals of the time with a rich source of debate, disagreement and delineation regarding the function of journalism. While considering contemporary discussions of the social and political purposes of journalism, we should be aware that definitional problems have beset the practice for well over a hundred years and across very different technological and cultural regimes. This paper explores a range of periodical discussion with the intention of highlighting key points in the debate from the late nineteenth century and asserts the continuing relevance of defining the roles of journalism in the present day.
  • References (71)
    71 references, page 1 of 8

    Anon. 1858. “The Atlantic Telegraph. Chapter 3 Results.” The Leisure Hour: A Family Journal of Instruction and Recreation 726-730.

    Anon. 1859. “Andrews's History of British Journalism.” The London Review, October, 2-18.

    Anon. 1879. “Telephonic Reporting for the Press.” All Year Round, 65-88.

    Anon. 1883. “How the Newspaper Is Made.” The Leisure Hour, January, 38-42.

    Anon. 1887. “An Old Man's Jubilee Grumble.” The Leisure Hour, August, 554-555.

    Anon. 1888a. “English Newspapers: Chapters in the History of English Newspaper.” The Athenaeum, January 14, 43-44.

    Anon. 1888b. “English Newspapers: Chapters in the History of Journalism.” The Academy, February 18, 107-108.

    Anon. 1890. “The Life of a Journalist.” The London Quarterly Review, April, 1-27.

    Anon. 1897. “The Hard Case of Women Journalists (Response).” The Review of Reviews, December, 598.

    Anon. 1899. “Lament of a Leader Writer.” Westminster Review, December, 656-664.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 65
Share - Bookmark