Clinical laboratory practices for the detection of rotavirus in England and Wales: can surveillance based on routine laboratory testing data be used to evaluate the impact of vaccination?

Article English OPEN
Atchison, CJ ; Lopman, BA ; Harris, CJ ; Tam, CC ; Iturriza Gómara, M ; Gray, JJ (2009)
  • Publisher: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
  • Subject:
    mesheuropmc: viruses | virus diseases | fluids and secretions

: Two rotavirus vaccines have recently been licensed in Europe. Rotavirus surveillance data in many European countries are based on reports of laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infections. If surveillance data based on routine laboratory testing data are to be used to evaluate the impact of vaccination programmes, it is important to determine how the data are influenced by differences in testing practices, and how these practices are likely to affect the ability of the surveillance data to represent trends in rotavirus disease in the community. We conducted a survey of laboratory testing policies for rotavirus gastroenteritis in England and Wales in 2008. 60% (94/156) of laboratories responded to the survey. 91% of reporting laboratories offered routine testing for rotavirus all year round and 89% of laboratories offered routine rotavirus testing of all stool specimens from children under the age of five years. In 96% of laboratories, rotavirus detection was presently done either by rapid immunochromatographic tests or by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Currently, rotavirus testing policies among laboratories in England and Wales are relatively homogenous. Therefore, surveillance based on laboratory testing data is likely to be representative of rotavirus disease trends in the community in the most frequently affected age groups (children under the age of five years) and could be used to help determine the impact of a rotavirus vaccine.<br/>
  • References (28)
    28 references, page 1 of 3

    Ninety-four of 156 (60%) microbiology laboratories in England and Wales returned completed questionnaires.

    A k n ow led ge m e n t s 11. Laboratory Reporting To The Health Protection Agency: Guide For Diagnostic

    Laboratories. London: Health Protection Agency; revised Sept 2008. Available

    from: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1194947381307 12. Velazquez FR, Matson DO, Calva JJ, Guerrero L, Morrow AL, Carter-Campbell

    infections. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(14):1022-8. 13. Directory of Microbiolog y Laboratories. London: Department of Health; 2007.

    [Accessed April 2008]. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publichealth/

    Patientsafety/Microbiolog yandinfectioncontrol/DH_4135669 14. Kirkwood B. Comparison of means from several groups: analysis of variance.

    Blackwell Publishing Company; 2003. p. 80-6. 15. Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott,

    Williams and Wilkins; 2001. 16. Standards Unit, Evaluation and Standards Laboratory. Gastroenteritis: Sporadic

    cases. London: Health Protection Agency; 2007 Jul 27. VSOP 2 Issue 5. Available

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    25
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    LSHTM Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 25
Share - Bookmark