Can resilience be redeemed? Resilience as a metaphor for change, not against change

Article English OPEN
Deverteuil, Geoff ; Golubchikov, Oleg (2016)

Resilience has been critiqued as being regressively status quo and thus propping up neo-liberalism, that it lacks transformative potential, and that it can be used as a pretence to cast off needy people and places. We move from this critique of resilience to a critical resilience, based in the following arguments: (i) resilience can sustain alternative and previous practices that contradict neo-liberalism; (ii) resilience is more active and dynamic than passive; and (iii) resilience can sustain survival, thus acting as a precursor to more obviously transformative action such as resistance. These bring us more closely to a heterogeneous de-neo-liberalized reading of resilience, explicitly opening it to social justice, power relations and uneven development, and performing valuable conceptual and pragmatic work that usefully moves us beyond resistance yet retaining (long-term) struggle.
  • References (36)
    36 references, page 1 of 4

    Andres, L., and J. Round. 2015. “'The Role of 'Persistent Resilience' within Everyday Life and Polity: Households Coping with Marginality within the 'Big Society'.” Environment and Planning A 47 (3): 676- 690.

    Barrett, C. 2014. “Toward a Theory of Resilience for International Development Applications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (40): 14625-14630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320880111 Berkes, F., and H. Ross. 2013. “Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach.” Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 26 (1): 5-20.

    Braun, B. 2014. “A New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in the Age of Climate Change.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 49-64.

    Brown, K. 2014. “Global Environmental Change: A Social Turn for Resilience.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (1): 107-117.

    Burawoy, M. et al. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Churchill, S. 2003. “Resilience, not Resistance a Contribution to an Expanded Urban Conversation.” City 7 (3): 349-360.

    Cook, I., and E. Swyngedouw. 2012. “Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment: Towards a Future Research Agenda.” Urban Studies 49 (9): 1959- 1979.

    Cretney, R. 2014. “Resilience for Whom? Emerging Critical Geographies of Socio-ecological Resilience.” Geography Compass 8 (9): 627-640.

    Dennett, D. 2014. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: Penguin.

    DeVerteuil, G. 2012. “Resisting Gentrification-induced Displacement: Advantages and Disadvantages to 'Staying Put' among Non-profit Social services in London and Los Angeles.” Area 44 (2): 208-216.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    134
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 134
Share - Bookmark