Using information behaviors to evaluate the functionality and usability of electronic resources: From Ellis's model to evaluation

Article English OPEN
Makri, S. ; Blandford, A. ; Cox, A. L. (2008)

Information behavior (IB) research involves examining how people look for and use information, often with the sole purpose of gaining insights into the behavior displayed. However, it is also possible to examine IB with the purpose of using the insights gained to design new tools or improve the design of existing tools to support information seeking and use. This approach is advocated by David Ellis who, over two decades ago, presented a model of information seeking behaviors and made suggestions for how electronic tools might be designed to support these behaviors. Ellis also recognized that IBs might be used as the basis for evaluating as well as designing electronic resources. In this article, we present the IB evaluation methods. These two novel methods, based on an extension of Ellis's model, use the empirically observed IBs of lawyers as a framework for structuring user-centered evaluations of the functionality and usability of electronic resources. In this article, we present the IB methods and illustrate their use through the discussion of two examples. We also discuss benefits and limitations, grounded in specific features of the methods.
  • References (30)
    30 references, page 1 of 3

    Blandford, A., Gow, J., Buchanan, G., Rimmer, J., & Warwick, C. (2007). Creators, composers and consumers: Experiences of designing a digital library. Baranauskas, C. et al. (Eds.). INTERACT 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Part I, pp. 239-242.

    BlandfordA.,Keith, S., Connell, I.,&Edwards, H. (2004). Analytical usability evaluation for digital libraries: A case study. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp.

    27-36. June 7-11 2004. Tucson, Arizona, USA.

    Blandford, A., Keith, S., & Fields, B. (2006). Claims analysis “in the wild:” A case study on digital library development. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 21(2), 197-218.

    Blandford, A., Keith, S., Fields, B., & Furniss, D. (2007). Disrupting digital library development with scenario informed design. Interacting with Computers, 19(1), 70-82.

    Boren, M.,&Ramey, J. (2000). Thinking aloud: Reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 261-278. Colbert, M., Peltason, C., Fricke, R., & Sanderson, M.

    (1997). The application of process models of information-seeking during conceptual design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 73-81), August 18-20, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date.

    Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, May 1999, Dallas, TX, USA. Dumas, J., & Redish, J. (1999).A practical guide to usability testing. Exeter, United Kingdom: Intellect Books.

    Ellis, D. (1987). The derivation of a behavioral model for information retrieval system design.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 127
Share - Bookmark