Physician Opinions about EHR Use by EHR Experience and by Whether the Practice had optimized its EHR Use

Article English OPEN
Jamoom, EW ; Heisey-Grove, D ; Yang, N ; Scanlon, P (2016)
  • Publisher: OMICS International
  • Journal: Journal of health & medical informatics (vol: 7)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.4172/2157-7420.1000240, pmc: PMC5084912
  • Subject: EHR optimization | Physicians | National Electronic Health Records Survey (NEHRS) | Health information technology | Electronic health records | Article | R1
    mesheuropmc: health services administration | health care economics and organizations | social sciences | health care facilities, manpower, and services

Optimization and experience with using EHRs may improve physician experiences. Physician opinions about EHR-related impacts, and the extent to which these impacts differ by self-reported optimized EHR use and length of experience are examined through nationally representative physician data of EHR users from the National Electronic Health Records Survey extended survey (n=1,471). Logistic regression models first estimated how physicians' length of times using an EHR were associated with each EHR-related impact. Additionally, a similar set of models estimated the association of self-reported optimized EHR use with each EHR impact. At least 70% of physicians using EHRs continue to attribute their administrative burdens to their EHR use. Physicians with 4 or more years of EHR experience accounted for 58% of those using EHRs. About 71% of EHR users self-reported using an optimized EHR. Physicians with more EHR experience and those in practices that optimized EHR use had positive opinions about the impacts of using EHRs, compared to their counterparts. These findings suggest that longer experience with EHRs improves perceptions about EHR use; and that perceived EHR use optimization is crucial to identifying EHR-related benefits. Finding ways to reduce EHR-related administrative burden has yet to be addressed.
  • References (14)
    14 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Blumenthal D (2010) Launching HITECH. New England J Med 362: 382-385.

    2. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nehrs/2015_web_tables.pdf

    3. Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Alyousef B, Brown RL, Cartmill RS, et al. (2015) Impact of electronic health record technology on the work anodrkwlow of physicians in the intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform 84: 578-594.

    4. Nguyen L, Bellucci E, Nguyen LT (2014) Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform Nov 83: 779-796.

    5. Wormer BA, Colavita PD, Yokeley WT, Bradley JF, Williams KB, et al. (2015) Impact of implementing an electronic health record on surgical resident work low, duty hours, and operative experience. AmSurg 81: 170-175.

    6. Heisey-Grove D, Hunt D, Helwig (2014) A Physician-Reported Direct and Indirect Safety Impacts Associated with Electronic Health Record Technology Use. Ofice of the National Coordinator for Health InformonatiTechnology, Washington DC.

    7. http://www.urban.org/research/publication/lessons-literature-electronic-healthrecord-implementation

    11. Jamoom EW, Yang N, Hing E (2016) Adoption of certiied electronihcealth record systems and electronic information sharing in physician oficensi:teUd States, 2013 and 2014. NCHS Data Brief 236: 1-8.

    12. Scanlon P (2016) Evaluation of the 2015 National Electronic Health Records Survey. National Center for Health Statistics.

    13. Jamoom EW, Patel V, Furukawa MF, King J (2014) EHR adopters vs. nonadopters: impacts of barriers to, and federal initiatives for EHR adoption. Healthcare 2: 33-39.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark