Dodging the steamroller: fundamentals versus the carry trade

Book English OPEN
Copeland, Laurence ; Lu, Wenna ; Cardiff University (2013)
  • Publisher: Cardiff University
  • Subject: HB

Although, according to uncovered interest rate parity, exchange rates should move so as to prevent the carry trade being systematically profitable, there is a vast empirical literature demonstrating the opposite. High interest currencies more often tend to appreciate rather than depreciate, as noted by Fama (1983). In this paper, we treat volatility as the critical state variable and show that positive returns to the carry trade are overwhelmingly generated in the low-volatility "normal" state, whereas the high-volatility state is associated with lower returns or with losses as currencies revert to the long run level approximated by their mean real exchange rate - in other words, purchasing-power parity (PPP) tends to reassert itself, at least to some extent, during periods of turbulence. We confirm these results by comparing the returns from three possible monthly trading strategies: the carry trade, a strategy which is long the undervalued and short the overvalued currencies (the "fundamental" strategy) and a mixed strategy which involves switching from carry trade to fundamentals whenever volatility is in the top quartile. The mixed strategy generates positive returns greater than for either of the pure strategies.
  • References (5)

    Acharya, V. V. and Pedersen, L. H.: 2005, Asset pricing with liquidity risk, Journal of Financial Economics 77(2), 375–410 Adrian T and Rosenberg J (2008) Stock Returns and Volatility: Pricing the Short Run and Long Run Components of Market Risk, Journal of Finance, 63, 2997-3030 Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold, F X and Labys P (2001) The Distribution of Realized Exchange Rate Volatility, Journal of American Statistical Association, 96, 42-55

    Backus D, Foresi S and Telmer C (2001) A¢ne Term Structure Models and the Forward Premium Anomaly, Journal of Finance, 56 (1), 279-304 Bacchetta, P. and van Wincoop, E.: 2006, Can information heterogeneity explain the exchange rate determination puzzle?, American Economic Review, 96, 552–576.

    Barro R J (2006) Rare Disasters and Asset Markets in the Twentieth Century, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 823-866 Bhansali, V.: 2007, Volatility and the carry trade, Journal of Fixed Income 17(3), 72–84.

    Brunnermeier, M, Nagel, S and Pedersen, L (2009), Carry trades and currency crashes, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2008 23, 313-347 Burnside, R, Eichenbaum, M, Kleshchelski, I and Rebelo, S (2006) The returns to currency speculation, Unpublished Working Paper, Northwestern University Burnside, R, Eichenbaum, M, Kleshchelski, I and Rebelo, S (2008) Can Peso problems explain the returns to the carry trade?, NBERWorking Paper #14054 Burnside, R, Eichenbaum and Rebelo, S (2007) Understanding the Forward Premium Puzzle: a Microstructure Approach, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 127-54 Campbell J and Clarida R (1987) The Term Structure of Euromarket Interest Rates, Journal of Monetary Economics, 19, 25-44 Christiansen C, Ranaldo A and Söderlind P (2011) The Time-Varying Systematic Risk of Carry Trade Strategies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(04), pages 1107-1125 Clarida, R, Davis, J and Pedersen N(2009) Currency carry trade regimes: Beyond the Fama regression, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 8, December, 1375-1389

    Cumby R and Obstfeld M (1981) A Note on Exchange Rate Expectations and Nominal Interest Di¤erentials: A Test of the Fisher Hypothesis, Journal of Finance, 36, 697-704

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 53
Share - Bookmark