Building user commitment to implementing a knowledge management strategy

Article English OPEN
Edwards, John S. ; Shaw, Duncan A.

In the IS literature, commitment is typically considered to involve organizational or managerial support for a system and not that of its users. This paper however reports on a field study involving 16 organizations that attempted to build user involvement in developing a knowledge management strategy by having them design it. Twenty-two IT-supported group workshops (involving 183 users) were run to develop action plans for better knowledge management that users would like to see implemented. Each workshop adopted the same problem structuring technique to assist group members develop a politically feasible action plan to which they were psychologically and emotionally dedicated. In addition to reviewing the problem structuring method, this paper provides qualitative insight into the factors a knowledge management strategy should have to encourage user commitment. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • References (60)
    60 references, page 1 of 6

    [1] F. Ackermann, C. Eden, SODA-journey making and mapping in practice, in: J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001, pp. 43-60.

    [2] M. Alavi, D.E. Leidner, Review: knowledge management and knowledge management Systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly (25) 2001, pp. 107-136.

    [3] M.G. Assad, The X-Y chart: a tool for systems designers, Information & Management (2) 1979, pp. 175-179.

    [4] R. Battams, Knowledge management strategy at <company name removed for confidentiality>, Aston Business School. MBA Thesis. Aston University, Birmingham, 2002.

    [5] B. Berelson, Content Analysis in Commmunicative Research, Free Press, New York, 1952.

    [6] R.P. Bostrom, R. Anson, V.K. Clawson, Group facilitation and group support systems, in: L.M. Jessup, J.S. Valacich (Eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, McMillan Publishing Company, New York, 1993, pp. 146-168.

    [7] P. Checkland, Soft systems methodology, in: J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001 , pp. 61- 90.

    [8] B. Choi, H. Lee, An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance, Information & Management (40) 2003, pp. 403-417.

    [9] W.M. Cohen, D. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly (35) 1990, pp. 128-152.

    [10] J. Conklin, Wicked problems and social complexity, Working Paper of the CogNexus Institute, 2003 (Available at: http:// www.gdss.com/index.html).

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark