Inside out: the interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision making: theory and practice

Article English OPEN
Gong, Mengfeng ; Simpson, Andrew ; Koh, Lenny ; Tan, Kim Hua (2018)

There has been an increasing interest in the use of decision-making models to achieve sustainability goal in recent decades. However, a systematic review of performance metrics, which are an important element of decision-making models to evaluate the outcomes regarding firm’s economic, environmental and social performance, is lacking. This study provides critical reflections on the current state of literature and industry development regarding sustainable performance metrics and offers concrete suggestions to guide future research. This study contributes to existing studies by (1) exploring the interrelationship between sustainable triple-bottom performance in the decision making process; (2) integrating corporate governance mechanism into decision making process for sustainable consideration; and (3) conducting a comparison between academic theory and industry practice regarding the performance metrics proposed and employed.
  • References (26)
    26 references, page 1 of 3

    Abdul, Z. and Ibrahim, S., 2002. Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2(4), pp.10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700210447641.

    Adhitya, A., Halim, I. and Srinivasan, R. 2011. Decision support for green supply chain operations by integrating dynamic simulation and LCA indicators: Diaper case study". Environmental Science and Technology, 45 (23), pp.10178-10185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es201763q.

    Awudu, I. and Zhang, J.2012. Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2), pp.1359-1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.016.

    Bai, C. G. and Sarkis, J. 2014. Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 19 (3), pp.275-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/Scm-12-2013-0441.

    Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Wei, X. and Koh, L. 2012. Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (1), pp.78-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598541211212221.

    Bear, S., Rahman, N. and Post, C., 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), pp.207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.

    Campbell, J.L., 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), pp.946-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684.

    Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), pp. 497-505. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296.

    Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A. and Paquet, M. 2012. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), pp.37-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.025.

    Chen, R. H., Lin, Y. H. and Tseng, M. L. 2015. Multicriteria analysis of sustainable development indicators in the construction minerals industry in China. Resources Policy, 46, pp.123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.012.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark