An adaptive finite element procedure for fully-coupled point contact elastohydrodynamic lubrication problems

Article English OPEN
Ahmed, S ; Goodyer, CE ; Jimack, PK (2014)
• Publisher: Elsevier

This paper presents an automatic locally adaptive finite element solver for the fully-coupled EHL point contact problems. The proposed algorithm uses a posteriori error estimation in the stress in order to control adaptivity in both the elasticity and lubrication domains. The implementation is based on the fact that the solution of the linear elasticity equation exhibits large variations close to the fluid domain on which the Reynolds equation is solved. Thus the local refinement in such region not only improves the accuracy of the elastic deformation solution significantly but also yield an improved accuracy in the pressure profile due to increase in the spatial resolution of fluid domain. Thus, the improved traction boundary conditions lead to even better approximation of the elastic deformation. Hence, a simple and an effective way to develop an adaptive procedure for the fully-coupled EHL problem is to apply the local refinement to the linear elasticity mesh. The proposed algorithm also seeks to improve the quality of refined meshes to ensure the best overall accuracy. It is shown that the adaptive procedure effectively refines the elements in the region(s) showing the largest local error in their solution, and reduces the overall error with optimal computational cost for a variety of EHL cases. Specifically, the computational cost of proposed adaptive algorithm is shown to be linear with respect to problem size as the number of refinement levels grows.
• References (47)
47 references, page 1 of 5

[1] S. Ahmed. Efficient Finite Element Simulation of Full-System Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication Problems. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2012.

[2] S. Ahmed, C. E. Goodyer, and P. K. Jimack. An efficient preconditioned iterative solution of fullycoupled elastohydrodynamic lubrication problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 62(5):649- 663, 2012.

[3] S. Ahmed, C. E. Goodyer, and P. K. Jimack. On the linear finite element analysis of fully-coupled point contact elastohydrodynamic lubrication problems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 226(5):350-361, (2012).

[4] M. Ainsworth and J. T. Oden. A posteriori error estimation in finite analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000.

[5] M. Ainsworth, J. Z. Zhu, A. W. Craig, and O. C. Zienkiewicz. Analysis of the Zienkiewicz-Zhu aposteriori error estimator in the finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 28:2161-2174, 1989.

[6] T. Apel, S. Grosman, P. K. Jimack, and A. Meyer. A New Methodology for Anisotropic Mesh Refinement Based Upon Error Gradients. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 50:329-341, 2004.

[7] I. Babuska, T. Strouboulis, C. S. Upadhyay, S. K. Gangaraj, and K. Copps. Validation of a posteriori error estimators by numerical approach. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 37:1073-1123, 1994.

[8] J. Boyle, M. Mihajlovic, and J. Scott. Hsl mi20: An efficient amg preconditioner for finite element problems in 3d. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 82(1):64-98, 2010.

[9] A. Brandt and A. A. Lubrecht. Multilevel Matrix Multiplication and Fast Solution of Integral Equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 90(2):348-370, 1990.

[10] W. L. Briggs, V. E. Henson, and S. F. McCormick. A Multigrid Tutorial. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2000.

• Metrics
0
views in OpenAIRE
0
views in local repository
78

The information is available from the following content providers: