Frequency of breaks in sedentary time and postprandial metabolic responses

Article English OPEN
Hawari, Nabeha S.A. ; Al-Shayji, Iqbal ; Wilson, John ; Gill, Jason M.R. (2016)

Purpose: To compare the metabolic effects of breaking up sedentary time with prolonged periods of standing versus multiple shorter standing bouts with the same total duration to determine whether, in principle, altering the frequency of ‘standing breaks’ in sedentary time, influences metabolic responses over the course of the day.\ud Methods: Ten normoglycaemic overweight/obese men (age 33±13 years; BMI 28.3±3.0 kg.m2; mean±SD) each participated in three experimental trials in random order, in which they arrived fasted, then consumed a test breakfast (8 body weight, with 37% energy from fat, 49% from carbohydrates, 14% from protein) and, 4 hours later, an identical test lunch. Expired air and blood samples were taken fasted and for eight hours postprandially. In one trial (SIT) participants sat continuously throughout the observation period; in the prolonged standing trial (PRO-Stand), participants stood still for 15 minutes every 30 minutes; and in the intermittent standing trial (INT-Stand), they stood for 1.5 minutes, 10 times every 30 minutes.\ud Results: Compared to SIT energy expenditure was 320±62 kJ (10.7±2.0%) higher in PRO-Stand and 617±76 kJ (20.4±2.3%) higher in INT-Stand: energy expenditure in INT-Stand was 296±78 kJ (9.0±2.3%) higher than PRO-Stand (mean±SEM; all p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences between trials in postprandial glucose, insulin or triglyceride responses.\ud Conclusions: These data demonstrate an independent effect of frequency of sedentary breaks on energy expenditure which provides an explanation for the association between frequency of sedentary breaks and adiposity observed in epidemiological data. However, it may be necessary to break up sitting with activities of greater intensity than quiet standing to positively influence glucose, insulin and triglyceride metabolism in relatively young, normoglycaemic overweight/obese men.
  • References (31)
    31 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Bailey DP and Locke CD. Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18:294-298.

    2. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol. 1992;1:98-101.

    3. Cooper AR, Sebire S, Montgomery AA, et al. Sedentary time, breaks in sedentary time and metabolic variables in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012;55:589-599.

    4. Dunstan DW, Kingwell BA, Larsen R, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:976-983.

    5. Edwardson CL, Gorely T, Davies MJ, et al. Association of sedentary behaviour with metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e34916.

    6. Farah NM and Gill JM. Effects of exercise before or after meal ingestion on fat balance and postprandial metabolism in overweight men. Br J Nutr. 2013;109:2297-2307.

    7. Fatouros IG, Chatzinikolaou A, Tournis S, et al. Intensity of resistance exercise determines adipokine and resting energy expenditure responses in overweight elderly individuals. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2161-2167.

    8. Flatt JP, Ravussin E, Acheson KJ, and Jequier E. Effects of dietary fat on postprandial substrate oxidation and on carbohydrate and fat balances. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:1019- 1024.

    9. Frayn KN and Macdonald IA. Assessment of substrate and energy metabolism in vivo. In: Draznin B and Rizza R, editors. Clinical Research in Diabetes and Obesity Part I: Methods, Assessment, and Metabolic Regulation. Totowa NJ: Humana Press, 1997. p. 101-124.

    10. Gill JM, Malkova D, and Hardman AE. Reproducibility of an oral fat tolerance test is influenced by phase of menstrual cycle. Horm. Metab Res. 2005;37:336-341.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark