Choosing your Moment: Interruptions in Multimedia Annotation

Conference object, Part of book or chapter of book English OPEN
Bowers , Christopher , ; Byrne , Will ; Cowan , Benjamin , ; Creed , Chris ; Hendley , Robert , ; Beale , Russell (2011)
  • Publisher: Springer
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_33
  • Subject: mixed-initiative annotation | [ INFO ] Computer Science [cs] | multimedia annotation | QA75 | QA76 | Task interruption

Part 1: Long and Short Papers; International audience; In a cooperative mixed-initiative system, timely and effective dialogue between the system and user is important to ensure that both sides work towards producing the most effective results, and this is affected by how disruptive any interruptions are as the user completes their primary task. A disruptive interaction means the user may become irritated with the system, or might take longer to deal with the interruption and provide information that the system needs to continue. Disruption is influenced both by the nature of the interaction and when it takes place in the context of the user’s progress through their main task. We describe an experiment based on a prototype cooperative video annotation system designed to explore the impact of interruptions, in the form of questions posed by the system that the user must address. Our findings demonstrate a preference towards questions presented in context with the content of the video, rather than at the natural opportunities presented by transitions in the video. This differs from previous research which concentrates on interruptions in the form of notifications.
  • References (19)
    19 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Adamczyk, P. D. & Bailey, B. P. If Not Now When? The Effects of Interruptions at Different Moments Within Task Execution. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '04. ACM (2004) 271-278.

    2. Allen, J.F. Mixed-Initiative Interaction. Intelligent Systems and their Applications, IEEE. 14, 5 (1999) 14-23.

    3. Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. & Carlis, J.V. Measuring the Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance in the User Interface. In IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2000) 757-762.

    4. Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. & Carlis, J.V. The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. In Proc. of INTERACT 2001 (2001) 593 - 601.

    5. Bailey, B. P. & Iqbal, S. T. Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact. 14, 4 (2008), 1-28.

    6. Creed, C., Lonsdale, P., Hendley, B. & Beale, R. Synergistic Annotation of Multimedia Content. In Proc of the 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in ComputerHuman Interactions, (2010) 205-208.

    7. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. & Horvitz, E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. In Proc. of Interact 2001 (2001) 263-269.

    8. Czerwinski, M., Cutrel, E. & Horvitz, E. Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance. OZCHI 2000 Conference Proceedings (2000) 356-361.

    9. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. In Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (1999) 159-166

    10. Horvitz, E., Kadie, C., Paek, T & Hovel, D. Models of attention in computing and communication: from principles to applications. Comm. ACM, 46, 3 (2003) 52-59

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark