Using research to influence sexual and reproductive health practice and implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa: a case-study analysis

Article English OPEN
Tulloch, Olivia ; Mayaud, Philippe ; Adu-Sarkodie, Yaw ; Kofi Opoku, Baafuor ; Oye Lithur, Nana ; Sickle, Eugene ; Delany-Moretlwe, Sinead ; Wambura, Mwita ; Changalucha, John ; Theobald, Sally (2011)

Background\ud Research institutions and donor organizations are giving growing attention to how research evidence is communicated to influence policy. In the area of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and HIV there is less weight given to understanding how evidence is successfully translated into practice. Policy issues in SRH can be controversial, influenced by political factors and shaped by context such as religion, ethnicity, gender and sexuality.\ud \ud Methods\ud The case-studies presented in this paper analyse findings from SRH/HIV research programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: 1) Maternal syphilis screening in Ghana, 2) Legislative change for sexual violence survivors In Ghana, 3) Male circumcision policy in South Africa, and 4) Male circumcision policy in Tanzania. Our analysis draws on two frameworks, Sumner et al’s synthesis approach and Nutley’s research use continuum.\ud \ud Results\ud The analysis emphasises the relationships and communications involved in using research to influence policy and practice and recognises a distinction whereby practice is not necessarily influenced as a result of policy change – especially in SRH – where there are complex interactions between policy actors.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud Both frameworks demonstrate how policy networks, partnership and advocacy are critical in shaping the extent to which research is used and the importance of on-going and continuous links between a range of actors to maximize research impact on policy uptake and implementation. The case-studies illustrate the importance of long-term engagement between researchers and policy makers and how to use evidence to develop policies which are sensitive to context: political, cultural and practical.
  • References (21)
    21 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Sumner A, Crichton J, Theobald S, et al: What shapes research impact on policy: Understanding research uptake in SRH policy processes in resource poor contexts. Health Research Policy and Systems , This supplement.

    2. Court J, Young J: Bridging Research and Policy: Insights From 50 Case Studies. In ODI Working Paper. Volume 213. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2003.

    3. Walt G, Gilson L: Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning 1994, 9(4):353-370.

    4. Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H: Using evidence: How Research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press; 2007.

    5. Crewe E, Young J: Bridging research and policy: context, evidence and links. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2002.

    6. Court J: Bridging Research and Policy on HIV/AIDS in Developing Countries. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2004.

    7. Dickenson C, Buse K: Understanding the politics of national HIV policies: the roles of institutions, interests and ideas. Technical Approach Paper HSLP. London; 2008.

    8. Gilson L, Raphaely N: The Terrain of Health Policy Analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994-2007. Health Policy and Planning 2008, 23(5):294-30.

    9. Greene D, David JL: A research design for generalizing from multiple case studies. Evaluation and Program Planning 1984, 7(1):73-85.

    10. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al: Randomized controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Medicine 2005, 2(11):e298.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark