Development of competency models for assessors and simulators in high-stakes selection processes

Article English OPEN
Patterson, F. ; Zibarras, L. D. ; Kerrin, M. ; Lopes, S. ; Price, R. (2014)

Background: Selection for entry into UK medical specialty training is a high-stakes, high-volume process. For selection into General Practice, a large number of assessors and simulators are involved in the delivery of the selection centre, which represents the final stage of selection.\ud \ud Aim: In order to standardize and quality-assure assessor and simulator involvement in the process, we developed two competency models outlining the knowledge, skills and attributes associated with each role using a previously validated job analysis methodology.\ud \ud Results: The final qualitative analysis resulted in two competency models, each encompassing eight competency domains. In general, results from a validation questionnaire demonstrated positive feedback from various regional recruitment leads in the UK (nā€‰=ā€‰14).\ud \ud Conclusion: Both models are currently being used in practice for quality assurance and training purposes. We conclude that the competency models can be used in three ways: (1) recruiting assessors/simulators; (2) in measuring performance of assessors/simulators and highlighting areas for potential development; and (3) they can be used for training assessors/simulators.
  • References (9)

    Austin Z, Gregory P, Tabak D. (2006). Simulated patients vs. standardized patients in objective structured clinical examinations. Am J Pharm Educ 70(5):1-7.

    Brownell J. 2005. Predicting leadership: The assessment center's extended role. Int J Contemp Hospit Manag 17(1):7-21.

    Chen H.-C. 2006. Assessment center: A critical mechanism for assessing hrd effectiveness and accountability. Adv Develop Hum Resour 8(2):247-264.

    Flanagan JC. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51(4):327-358.

    Lievens F, Patterson F. 2011. The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. J Appl Psychol 96(5):927-940.

    Patterson F, Baron H, Carr V, Plint S, Lane P. 2009. Evaluation of three short-listing methodologies for selection into postgraduate training in general practice. Med Edu 43(1):50-57.

    Patterson F, Ferguson E, Lane P, Farrell K, Martlew J, Wells A. 2000. A competency model for general practice: Implications for selection, training, and development. Brit J General Pract 50:188-193.

    Patterson F, Ferguson E, Norfolk T, Lane P. 2005. A new selection system to recruit general practice registrars: Preliminary findings from a validation study. Brit Med J 330(7493):711-714.

    Wyatt MRR, Pathak SB, Zibarras L. 2010. Advancing selection in an SME: Is best practice methodology applicable? Int Small Bus J 28(3):258-273.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    City Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 61
Share - Bookmark