Perceived diagnostic delay and cancer-related distress: a cross sectional study of patients with colorectal cancer.

Article English OPEN
Miles, Anne ; McClements, P. ; Steele, R. ; Redeker, C. ; Sevdalis, N. ; Wardle, J. (2017)

Objective: This study aimed to examine the effect of perceived diagnostic delay on cancer-related distress, and determine whether fear of cancer-recurrence and quality of life mediate this relationship.\ud Methods: Cross-sectional study in which 311 colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors in Scotland completed a survey which included questions on cancer-related distress (IES-R), perceived diagnostic delay, quality of life (trial outcome index of the FACT-C: FACT-C TOI) and fear of cancer recurrence. 15 patients withheld consent to data matching with medical records, leaving a sample size of 296. Participants were an average of 69 years old (range 56 to 81) and between 3.5 to 12 years post-diagnosis. Multiple regressions were used to test predictors of distress, and regression and bootstrapping to test for mediation.\ud Results: Perceived diagnostic delay was correlated with higher cancer-related distress, while objective markers of diagnostic delay (disease stage at diagnosis and treatment received) were not. Some of the relationship between perceived diagnostic delay and cancer-related distress was mediated by quality of life, but not by fear of cancer recurrence. \ud Conclusions: Perceived diagnostic delay was associated with higher cancer-related distress among CRC survivors. While poorer quality of life partly explained such associations, fear of cancer recurrence, stage at diagnosis and treatment did not. The exact features of diagnostic delay that are associated with cancer-related distress remain unclear. Future research should examine the experiences patients go through prior to diagnosis that may increase distress, in an effort to improve our understanding of the factors affecting emotional wellbeing among CRC survivors.
  • References (41)
    41 references, page 1 of 5

    1. Thomson CS, Forman D. Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results? Brit J Cancer 2009; 101: S102-S109. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605399.

    2. Austoker J, Bankhead C, Forbes LJ, et al. Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review. Brit J Cancer 2009; 101: S31-S39. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605388.

    3. Mansell G, Shapley M, Jordan JL, et al. Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review. Brit J Gen Pract 2011; 61: e821-e835. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613160.

    4. Miles A, Wardle J, Atkin W. Receiving a screen-detected diagnosis of cancer: the experience of participants in the UK flexible sigmoidoscopy trial. Psycho-oncol 2003; 12: 784-802.

    5. Green BL, Rowland JH, Krupnick JL, et al. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in women with breast cancer. Psychosomatics 1998; 39: 102-111.

    6. Brocken P, van der Heijden EH, Oud KT, et al. Distress in suspected lung cancer patients following rapid and standard diagnostic programs: a prospective observational study. Psychooncol 2015; 24: 433-441. doi: 10.1002/pon.3660.

    7. Holland J, Watson M, Dunn J. The IPOS new International Standard of Quality Cancer Care: integrating the psychosocial domain into routine care. Psycho-oncol 2011; 20: 677-680. doi: 10.1002/pon.1978.

    8. Kangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA. The course of psychological disorders in the 1st year after cancer diagnosis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73: 763-768.

    9. Okamura M, Yamawaki S, Akechi T, et al. Psychiatric disorders following first breast cancer recurrence: prevalence, associated factors and relationship to quality of life. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005; 35: 302-309.

    10. Abbey G, Thompson SB, Hickish T, et al. A meta-analysis of prevalence rates and moderating factors for cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Psycho-oncol 2015; 24: 371-381. doi: 10.1002/pon.3654.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Birkbeck Institutional Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 38
Share - Bookmark