Dying in hospital: : socioeconomic inequality trends in England

Article English OPEN
Barratt, Helen ; Asaria, Miqdad ; Sheringham, Jessica ; Stone, Patrick ; Raine, Rosalind ; Cookson, Richard Andrew
  • Publisher: SAGE Publications
  • Journal: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, volume 22, issue 3, pages 149-154 (issn: 1355-8196, eissn: 1758-1060)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1177/1355819616686807, pmc: PMC5548360
  • Subject: England | inequalities | place of death | England, inequalities, palliative care, place of death | Original Research | palliative care

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in socioeconomic inequality in the proportion of deaths occurring in hospital, during a period of sustained effort by the NHS in England to improve end of life care. METHODS: Whole-population, small area longitudinal study involving 5,260,871 patients of all ages who died in England from 2001/2002 to 2011/2012. Our primary measure of inequality was the slope index of inequality. This represents the estimated gap between the most and least deprived neighbourhood in England, allowing for the gradient in between. Neighbourhoods were geographic Lower Layer Super Output Areas containing about 1500 people each. RESULTS: The overall proportion of patients dying in hospital decreased from 49.5% to 43.6% during the study period, after initially increasing to 52.0% in 2004/2005. There was substantial ‘pro-rich’ inequality, with an estimated difference of 5.95 percentage points in the proportion of people dying in hospital (confidence interval 5.26 to 6.63), comparing the most and least deprived neighbourhoods in 2011/2012. There was no significant reduction in this gap over time, either in absolute terms or relative to the mean, despite the overall reduction in the proportion of patients dying in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to reduce the proportion of patients dying in hospital in England have been successful overall but did not reduce inequality. Greater understanding of the reasons for such inequality is required before policy changes can be determined.
  • References (20)
    20 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Economist Intelligence Unit. The 2015 quality of death index, www.economistinsights.com/healthcare/analysis/ quality-death-index-2015 (accessed 16 December 2016).

    2. End of Life Care Strategy: promoting high quality care for adults at the end of their life, GOV.UK, www.gov.uk/government/publications/end-of-life-care-strategy-promotinghigh-quality-care-for-adults-at-the-end-of-their-life (accessed 3 November 2015).

    3. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, et al. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12: 7.

    4. Brereton L, Gardiner C, Gott M, et al. The hospital environment for end of life care of older adults and their families: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2012; 68: 981-993.

    5. Gerrard R, Campbell J, Minton O, et al. Achieving the preferred place of care for hospitalized patients at the end of life. Palliat Med 2011; 25: 333-336.

    6. Gomes B, Calanzani N and Higginson IJ. Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004- 2010. Palliat Med 2012; 26: 102-107.

    7. Deprivation and death: variation in place and cause of death, www.endoflifecare-intelligence.org.uk/resources/ publications/deprivation_and_death (accessed 3 November 2015).

    8. Dixon J, King D, Matosevic T, et al. Equity in the provision of palliative care in the UK: review of evidence. London: London School of Economics, 2015.

    9. Barbera L, Paszat L and Chartier C. Death in hospital for cancer patients: an indicator of quality of end-of-life care. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 435-436.

    10. Waghorn M, Young H and Davies A. Opinions of patients with cancer on the relative importance of place of death in the context of a 'good death'. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2011; 2011: 000041.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark