Amalgamated Reference Data for Size-Adjusted Bone Densitometry Measurements in 3598 Children and Young Adults - The Alphabet Study

Article English OPEN
Crabtree, N.J. ; Shaw, N.J. ; Bishop, N.J. ; Adams, J.E. ; Mughal, M.Z. ; Arundel, P. ; Fewtrell, M.S. ; Ahmed, S.F. ; Treadgold, L.A. ; Högler, W. ; Bebbington, N.A. ; Ward, K.A. ; ALPHABET Study Team, . (2017)
  • Publisher: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
  • Subject:
    mesheuropmc: musculoskeletal diseases

The increasing use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in children has led to the need for robust reference data for interpretation of scans in daily clinical practice. Such data need to be representative of the population being studied and be “future-proofed” to software and hardware upgrades. The aim was to combine all available pediatric DXA reference data from seven UK centers to create reference curves adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and body size to enable clinical application, using in vivo cross-calibration and making data back and forward compatible. Seven UK sites collected data on GE Lunar or Hologic Scanners between 1996 and 2012. Males and females aged 4 to 20 years were recruited (n = 3598). The split by ethnic group was white 2887; South Asian 385; black Afro-Caribbean 286; and mixed heritage 40. Scans of the total body and lumbar spine (L1 to L4) were obtained. The European Spine Phantom was used to cross-calibrate the 7 centers and 11 scanners. Reference curves were produced for L1 to L4 bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) and total body less head (TBLH) and L1 to L4 areal bone mineral density (aBMD) for GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA (sex- and ethnic-specific) and for Hologic (sex-specific). Regression equations for TBLH BMC were produced using stepwise linear regression. Scans of 100 children were randomly selected to test backward and forward compatibility of software versions, up to version 15.0 for GE Lunar and Apex 4.1 for Hologic. For the first time, sex- and ethnic-specific reference curves for lumbar spine BMAD, aBMD, and TBLH aBMD are provided for both GE Lunar and Hologic scanners. These curves will facilitate interpretation of DXA data in children using methods recommended in ISCD guidelines. The databases have been created to allow future updates and analysis when more definitive evidence for the best method of fracture prediction in children is agreed. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
  • References (35)
    35 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Crabtree NJ, Arabi A, Bachrach LK, Fewtrell M, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Kecskemethy HH, et al. Dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2014; 17(2):225-42. [PubMed: 24690232]

    2. Gordon CM, Leonard MB, Zemel BS, International Society for Clinical D. 2013 Pediatric Position Development Conference: executive summary and reflections. J Clin Densitom. 2014; 17(2):219- 24. [PubMed: 24657108]

    3. Bishop N, Arundel P, Clark E, Dimitri P, Farr J, Jones G, et al. Fracture prediction and the definition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents: the ISCD 2013 Pediatric Official Positions. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2014; 17(2):275-80. [PubMed: 24631254]

    4. Carter D, Bouxsein M, Marcus R. New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res. 1992; 7:137-45. [PubMed: 1570758]

    5. Kroger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J, Kotaniemi A. Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology. Bone. 1995; 17(2 SU -):157-9. [PubMed: 8554924]

    6. Zemel BS, Kalkwarf HJ, Gilsanz V, Lappe JM, Oberfield S, Shepherd JA, et al. Revised reference curves for bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density according to age and sex for black and non-black children: results of the bone mineral density in childhood study. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011; 96(10):3160-9. [PubMed: 21917867]

    7. Zemel BS, Leonard MB, Kelly A, Lappe JM, Gilsanz V, Oberfield S, et al. Height adjustment in assessing dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mass and density in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(3):1265-73. [PubMed: 20103654]

    8. Crabtree NJ, Hogler W, Shaw NJ. Fractures in children with chronic inflammatroy and/or disabling conditions: The SNAP study. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(Suppl 6):S670.

    9. Hogler W, Briody J, Woodhead HJ, Chan A, Cowell CT. Importance of lean mass in the interpretation of total body densitometry in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2003; 143(1):81-8. [PubMed: 12915829]

    10. Schoenau E. The "functional muscle-bone unit": a two-step diagnostic algorithm in pediatric bone disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005; 20(3):356-9. [PubMed: 15688231]

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Similar Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark