The prevalence of two ‘commonly’ encountered synthetic target fibres within a large urban environment

Article English OPEN
Palmer, Ray; Burnett, Elisabeth; Luff, Natalie; Wagner, Craig; Stinga, Georgia; Carney, Clare; Sheridan, Kelly;

A target fibre study was carried out to assess the random prevalence of two ostensibly commonly encountered synthetic fibre types; black acrylic and blue polyester. The study was performed in an environment which maximised the number of random contacts between textile g... View more
  • References (21)
    21 references, page 1 of 3

    8. Grieve, M.C., T.W. Biermann, and K. Schaub, The individuality of fibres used to provide forensic evidence - not all blue polyesters are the same. Science & Justice, 2005. 45(1): p. 13-28.

    9. Biermann, T.W., Blocks of colour IV: The evidential value of blue and red cotton fibres. Science & Justice, 2007. 47(2): p. 68-87.

    10. Buzzini, P. and G. Massonnet. The discrimination of coloured acrylic, cotton and wool fibres using Raman spectroscopy. in ENFSI Europe Fibre Group. 2008. Budapest.

    11. Palmer, R., W. Hutchinson, and V. Fryer, The discrimination of (non-denim) blue cotton. Science & Justice, 2009. 49(1): p. 12-18.

    12. Massonnet, G., et al., Evaluation of Raman Spectroscopy for the analysis of colored fibers: A collaborative study. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2005. 50(5): p. 1028-1038.

    13. Jones, J. and T. Coyle, Synthetic flock fibres: A population and target fibre study. Science & Justice, 2011. 51(2): p. 68-71.

    14. Cook, R. and C. Wilson, The Significance of Finding Extraneous Fibers in Contact Cases. Forensic Science International, 1986. 32(4): p. 267-273.

    15. Jackson, G. and R. Cook, The Significance of Fibers Found on Car Seats. Forensic Science International, 1986. 32(4): p. 275-281.

    16. Cook, R., M. Salter, and O'Connor A-M. The significance of finding extraneous fibres on clothing. in IAFS. 1993. Dusseldorf.

    17. Palmer, R. and V. Chinherende, A target fiber study using cinema and car seats as recipient items. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1996. 41(5): p. 802-803.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark