Community health workers in rural India: analysing the opportunities and challenges Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) face in realising their multiple roles

Article English OPEN
Saprii, Lipekho ; Richards, Esther ; Kokho, Puni ; Theobald, Sally (2015)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: Human Resources for Health, volume 13 (eissn: 1478-4491)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4673775, doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0094-3
  • Subject: wa_546 | Incentives and disincentives | Public Administration | Qualitative | Community health workers | Accredited Social Health Activist | Roles and responsibilities | India | Research | wa_100 | wa_540 | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Background: Globally, there is increasing interest in community health worker’s (CHW) performance; however, there are gaps in the evidence with respect to CHWs’ role in community participation and empowerment. Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), whose roles include social activism, are the key cadre in India’s CHW\ud programme which is designed to improve maternal and child health. In a diverse country like India, there is a need to understand how the ASHA programme operates in different underserved Indian contexts, such as rural Manipur.\ud \ud Methods: We undertook qualitative research to explore stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of the ASHAscheme in strengthening maternal health and uncover the opportunities and challenges ASHAs face in realising their multiple roles in rural Manipur, India. Data was collected through in-depth interviews (n = 18) and focus group\ud discussions (n = 3 FGDs, 18 participants). Participants included ASHAs, key stakeholders and community members. They were purposively sampled based on remoteness of villages and primary health centres to capture diverse and relevant constituencies, as we believed experiences of ASHAs can be shaped by remoteness. Data were analysed\ud using the thematic framework approach.\ud \ud Results: Findings suggested that ASHAs are mostly understood as link workers. ASHA’s ability to address the immediate needs of rural and marginalised communities meant that they were valued as service providers. The programme is perceived to be beneficial as it improves awareness and behaviour change towards maternal care.\ud However, there are a number of challenges; the selection of ASHAs is influenced by power structures and poor community sensitisation of the ASHA programme presents a major risk to success and sustainability. The primary health centres which ASHAs link to are ill-equipped. Thus, ASHAs experience adverse consequences in their ability to inspire trust and credibility in the community. Small and irregular monetary incentives demotivate ASHAs. Finally,ASHAs had limited knowledge about their role as an ‘activist’ and how to realise this.\ud \ud Conclusions: ASHAs are valued for their contribution towards maternal health education and for their ability toprovide basic biomedical care, but their role as social activists is much less visible as envisioned in the ASHA\ud operational guideline. Access by ASHAs to fair monetary incentives commensurate with effort coupled with the poor functionality of the health system are critical elements limiting the role of ASHAs both within the health system and within communities in rural Manipur.
  • References (47)
    47 references, page 1 of 5

    1. World Health Organisation (WHO). Alma Ata Declaration. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978. declaration_en.pdf (Accessed on 10 June 2015).

    2. Greenspan JA, McMahon SA, Chebet JJ, Mpunga M, Urassa DP, Winch PJ. Sources of community health worker motivation: a qualitative study in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. Hum Resour Health BioMed Central. 2013;11(1):52.

    3. World Health Organization (WHO). Community health workers: What do we know about them. Policy briefs Geneva WHO. 2007. documents/community_health_workers.pdf [Accessed on 10 June 2015].

    4. Frankel S. The community health worker: effective programmes for developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    5. Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, Tien M. Community Health Worker Incentives and Disincentives: How They Affect Motivation, Retention, and Sustainability. Published by the Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival Project (BASICS II) for the United States Agency for International Development. Arlington, Virginia, October 2001.

    6. Scott K, Shanker S. Tying their hands? Institutional obstacles to the success of the ASHA community health worker programme in rural north India. AIDS Care. 2010;22 Suppl 2:1606-12.

    7. Haines A, Sanders D, Lehmann U, Rowe AK, Lawn JE, Jan S, et al. Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2121-31.

    8. Walt G. Community health workers in national programmes: just another pair of hands? Milton Keynes: Open University; 1990.

    9. World Health Organisation (WHO). Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. 2008. Geneva: WHO; 2008. TTR-TaskShifting.pdf.

    10. Lehmann U, Friedman I, Sanders D. Review of the Utilisation and Effectiveness of Community-Based Health Workers in Africa. University of the Western Cape, South Africa; SEED Trust, South Africa. 2004. http://www. 26NSystemsStrengthening/ReveiwUse%26EffectivenessOfCHWsInAfrica.pdf [Accessed on 2 December 2015]

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark