publication . Article . 2013

Strategy and pattern recognition in expert comprehension of 2×2 interaction graphs

David Peebles;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Sep 2013 Journal: Cognitive Systems Research, volume 24, pages 43-51 (issn: 1389-0417, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Elsevier BV
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract
I present a model of expert comprehension performance for 2 × 2 "interaction" graphs typically used to present data from two-way factorial research designs. Developed using the ACT-R cognitive architecture, the model simulates the cognitive and perceptual operations involved in interpreting interaction graphs and provides a detailed characterisation of the information\ud extracted from the diagram, the prior knowledge required to interpret interaction graphs, and the knowledge generated during the comprehension\ud process. The model produces a scan path of attention fixations and a symbolic description of the interpretation which can be compared to human eye mov...
Subjects
free text keywords: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, BF, QA75
Related Organizations
22 references, page 1 of 2

Ali, N., & Peebles, D. (in press). The e ect of Gestalt laws of perceptual organisation on the comprehension of three-variable bar and line graphs. Human Factors, doi:10.1177/0018720812452592 .

Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Coups, E. J. (2006). Statistics for Psychology . (4th ed.). London: Pearson.

Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 4 , 75{100.

Casner, S. M. (1991). A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 10 , 111{151. [OpenAIRE]

Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 , 531{554. [OpenAIRE]

Gillan, D. J. (1994). A componential model of human interaction with graphs: 1. linear regression modelling. Human Factors, 36 , 419{440.

Gunzelmann, G. (Ed.) (2011). Modeling spatial cognition [Special issue] volume 3. Topics in Cognitive Science.

Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 3 , 185{226. [OpenAIRE]

Kosslyn, S. M. (2006). Graph design for the eye and mind . New York: Oxford University Press. [OpenAIRE]

Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987). SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Arti cial Intelligence, 33 , 1{64. [OpenAIRE]

Lohse, G. L. (1993). A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction, 8 , 353{388.

McClelland, J. L. (2009). The place of modeling in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1 , 11{38.

Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance 1. basic mechanisms. Psychological Review , 104 , 3{65.

Peebles, D., & Ali, N. (2009). Di erences in comprehensibility between threevariable bar and line graphs. In Proceedings of the Thirty- rst Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2938{2943). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [OpenAIRE]

22 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue