Research Article Software Component Selection Based on Quality Criteria Using the Analytic Network Process

Article English OPEN
Nazir, Shah ; Anwar, Sajid ; Sher Afzal, Khan ; Shahzad, Sara ; Ali, Muhammad ; Amin, Rohul ; Nawaz, Muhammad ; Lazaridis, Pavlos ; Cosmas, John (2014)
  • Publisher: Hindawi
  • Subject: TK

Component based software development (CBSD) endeavors to deliver cost-effective and quality software systems through the selection and integration of commercially available software components. CBSD emphasizes the design and development of software systems using preexisting components. Software component reusability is an indispensable part of component based software development life cycle (CBSDLC),which consumes a significant amount of organization’s resources, that is, time and effort.\ud It is convenient in component based software system (CBSS) to select the most suitable and appropriate software components that provide all the required functionalities. Selecting the most appropriate components is crucial for the success of the entire system. However, decisions regarding software component reusability are often made in an ad hoc manner, which ultimately results in schedule delay and lowers the entire quality system. In this paper, we have discussed the analytic network process (ANP) method for software component selection. The methodology is explained and assessed using a real life case study.
  • References (51)
    51 references, page 1 of 6

    [1] A. Rawashdeh and B. Matalkah, “A new sowftare quality model for evaluating COTS components,” Journal of Computer Science, vol. 2, pp. 373-381, 2006.

    [2] D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom, “Architectural mismatch or why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 17th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '95) , pp. 179-185, Seattle, Wash, USA, April 1995.

    [3] A. A.-e.-S. Abd-Allah, Composing heterogeneous software architectures [Ph.D. thesis], Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1996.

    [4] D. Yakimovich, A Comprehensive Reuse Model for COTS Software Products, University of Maryland, College Park, Md, USA, 2001.

    [5] C. Albert and L. Brownsword, “Evolutionary Process for Integrating COTS-Based Systems (EPIC): An Overview,” Tech. Rep., Software Engineering Institute, 2002.

    [6] Y. Yang, J. Bhuta, B. Boehm, and D. N. Port, “Value-based processes for COTS-based applications,” IEEE Sowftare , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 54-62, 2005.

    [7] G. L. Hamza-Lup, A. Agarwal, R. Shankar, and C. Iskander, “Component selection strategies based on system requirements' dependencies on component attributes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Systems Conference Proceedings (SysCon '08), pp. 322-326, April 2008.

    [8] K. Eldrandaly, “An Intelligent MCDM approach for selecting the suitable expert system building tool,” eTh International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 4, pp. 365-372, 2007.

    [9] H. Aris and S. Salim, “State of component models usage: justifying the need for a component model selection framework,” eTh International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 310-317, 2011.

    [10] T. L. Saaty, “Fundamental of the analytic network process,” in Proceedings of the ISAHP, pp. 1-14, Kobe, Japan, 1999.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    University of Huddersfield Repository - IRUS-UK 0 18
Share - Bookmark