Hard to reach and hard to teach: supporting the self-regulation of learning in an alternative provision secondary school

Article English OPEN
Putwain, DW ; Nicholson, LJ ; Edwards, JL

© 2015 Taylor & Francis. Since 2010, new types of state-funded schools have opened in England with a focus on providing alternative education provision. Very little is known about these schools, partly due to their novelty, and how they are attempting to re-engage those students who for various, and often complex, reasons have become disconnected from education. We scrutinised the approach used at one such school to examine what instructional practices were used, how they were adapted to the needs of the students and what factors enabled and obstructed (re)engagement. Data were collected over a month-long fieldwork visit and included semi-structured interviews with staff and students, and semi-structured classroom observations. Instructional approaches were used that supported the learning of students who were not experienced in, or had difficulty with, regulating their learning. These included breaking down tasks, providing lots of on-task prompts, encouragement, using frequent feedback and scaffolding, and offering quick support to students. This approach allowed students to re-engage with their learning and make progress towards important qualifications required for entry to the labour market and post-compulsory education and training.
  • References (58)
    58 references, page 1 of 6

    Cleary, T.J., Patten, P., & Nelson, A.C. (2008). Effectiveness of self-regulation empowerment program with urban high-school students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 70- 107.doi: 10.4219/jaa-2008-866

    Cleary, T.J., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment programme: A school based programme to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537-550.doi: 10.1002/pits.10177

    Cleary, T.J., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2006). Teachers' perceived usefulness of strategy microanalytic assessment information. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 149-155.doi: 10.1002/pits.20141

    Cleary, T.J., & Zimmermnan, B.J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237- 257). London: Springer.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11

    Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

    Coles, B., Hutton, S., Bradshaw, J., Craig, G., Godfrey, C. & Johnson, J. (2002) Literature review on the costs of being not in education, employment or training at age 16-18 (Research Report No 347) (Nottingham, DfES).

    Cook, L. (2005) Schools without walls: Reconnecting the disconnected. Support for Learning, 20(2), 90-95.doi: 10.1111/j.0268-2141.2005.00367.x

    Daniels, H., Cole, T., Sellman, E., Sutton, J., Visser, J. & Bedward, J. (2003) Study of young people permanently excluded from school (Research Report No 405) (London, DfES).

    Cotton, D., Stokes, A., & Cotton, P. (2011). Using observational methods to research student experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 463-473.doi: 10.1080/03098265.2010.501541

    DfE (2013) Alternative Provision: Statutory guidance for local authorities. London: HMSO.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    LJMU Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 2
Share - Bookmark