A cross-cultural re-evaluation of the Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI) in five countries

Article English OPEN
Griffiths, MD ; Urbán, R ; Demetrovics, Z ; Lichtenstein, MB ; de la Vega, R ; Kun, B ; Ruiz-Barquín, R ; Youngman, J ; Szabo, A (2015)
  • Publisher: Springer International Publishing
  • Journal: Sports Medicine - Open, volume 1 (issn: 2199-1170, eissn: 2198-9761)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4532705, doi: 10.1186/s40798-014-0005-5
  • Subject: Original Research Article

Research into the detrimental effects of excessive exercise has been conceptualized in a number of similar ways, including ‘exercise addiction’ , ‘exercise dependence’ , ‘obligatory exercising’, ‘exercise abuse’, and ‘compulsive exercise’. Among the most currently used (and psychometrically valid and reliable) instruments is the Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI). The present study aimed to further explore the psychometric properties of the EAI by combining the datasets of a number of surveys carried out in five different countries (Denmark, Hungary, Spain, UK, and US) that have used the EAI with a total sample size of 6,031 participants. A series of multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were carried out examining configural invariance, metric invariance, and scalar invariance. The CFAs using the combined dataset supported the configural invariance and metric invariance but not scalar invariance. Therefore, EAI factor scores from five countries are not comparable because the use or interpretation of the scale was different in the five nations. However, the covariates of exercise addiction can be studied from a cross-cultural perspective because of the metric invariance of the scale. Gender differences among exercisers in the interpretation of the scale also emerged. The implications of the results are discussed, and it is concluded that the study’s findings will facilitate a more robust and reliable use of the EAI in future research.
  • References (32)
    32 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Berczik K, Szabo A, Griffiths MD, Kurimay T, Kun B, Urbán R, et al. Exercise addiction: symptoms, diagnosis, epidemiology, and etiology. Subst Use Misuse. 2012; 47:403-17.

    2. Cockerill IM, Riddington ME. Exercise dependence and associated disorders: a review. Couns Psychol Q. 1996; 9:119-29.

    3. Hausenblas HA, Symons DD. Exercise dependence: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2002; 3:89-123.

    4. Pasman L, Thompson JK. Body image and eating disturbance in obligatory runners, obligatory weightlifters, and sedentary individuals. Int J Eat Disord. 1988; 7:759-69.

    5. Davis C. Exercise abuse. Int J Sport Psychol. 2000; 31:278-89.

    6. Dalle Grave R, Calugi S, Marchesini G. Compulsive exercise to control shape or weight in eating disorders: prevalence, associated features, and treatment outcome. Comp Psychiatry. 2008; 49:346-52.

    7. Allegre B, Souville M, Therme P, Griffiths M. Definitions and measures of exercise dependence. Addict Res Theory. 2006; 14:631-46.

    8. Kurimay T, Griffiths MD, Berczik K, Demetrovics Z. Exercise addiction: the dark side of sports and exercise. In: Baron D, Reardon C, Baron SH, editors. Contemporary issues in sports psychiatry: a global perspective. Chichester: Wiley; 2013: p. 33-43.

    9. Ackard DM, Brehm BJ, Steffen JJ. Exercise and eating disorders in collegeaged women: profiling excessive exercisers. Eat Disord. 2002; 10:31-47.

    10. Downs DS, Hausenblas HA, Nigg CR. Factorial validity and psychometric examination of the exercise dependence scale-revised. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2004; 8:183-201.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark